• Abele E (2016) CIRP encyclopedia of production engineering. In: CIRP encyclopedia of production engineering, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35950-7

  • Abele E, Metternich J, Tisch M, Chryssolouris G, Sihn W, ElMaraghy H, Hummel V, Ranz F (2015) Learning factories for research, education, and training. Procedia CIRP 32:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.187

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abele E, Chryssolouris G, Sihn W, Metternich J, ElMaraghy H, Seliger G, Sivard G, ElMaraghy W, Hummel V, Tisch M, Seifermann S (2017) Learning factories for future oriented research and education in manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 66(2):803–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.005

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abele E, Metternich J, Tisch M (2019) Learning factories concepts, guidelines, best-practice examples. Springer International Publishing AG, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92261-4_2

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Aymans SC, Horn N, Kauffeld S (2018) Welchen Nutzen haben Lernfabriken als Lehrmethode in den Ingenieurswissenschaften wirklich? Eine Prä-Post-Erhebung mit Experimental-Kontrollgruppen-Vergleich. Arbeit(s).wissen.schaf(f)t – Grundlage Für Management Und Kompetenzentwicklung 7(1):1–6


    Google Scholar
     

  • Badische Zeitung (2016) Lernfabrik wird bald eröffnet. https://www.badische-zeitung.de/lernfabrik-wird-bald-eroeffnet–131444467.html

  • Bakeman R (2005) Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods 37(3):379–384

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Balve P, Ebert L (2019) Ex post evaluation of a learning factory: competence development based on graduates’ feedback. Procedia Manuf 31:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.002

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bauernhansl T, Tzempetonidou M, Rossmeissl T, Groß E, Siegert J (2018) Requirements for designing a cyber-physical system for competence development. Procedia Manuf 23(2017):201–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.017

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Belinski R, Peixe AMM, Frederico GF, Garza-Reyes JA (2020) Organizational learning and industry 4.0: findings from a systematic literature review and research agenda. Benchmarking 27(8):2435–2457. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2020-0158

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Biggs J (1996) Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High Educ 32(3):347–364. https://doi.org/10.11405/nisshoshi1964.98.330

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cachay J, Abele E (2012) Developing competencies for continuous improvement processes on the shop floor through learning factories—conceptual design and empirical validation. In: 45th CIRP conference on manufacturing systems 2012, vol 3, pp 638–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.109

  • Cachay J, Wennemer J, Abele E, Tenberg R (2012) Study on action-oriented learning with a learning factory approach. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 55:1144–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.608

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carretero S, Vuorikari R, Punie Y (2017) DigComp 2.1: the digital competence framework for citizens—with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. https://doi.org/10.2760/38842

  • Chomsky N (1966) Explanatory models in linguistics. Stud Logic Found Math 44(C):528–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-237X(09)70617-2

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Cambridge


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dehnbostel P (2014) Perspektiven für betriebliches und eLearning: informelles Lernen im Prozess der Arbeit. Elearn J 10(17):1–11


    Google Scholar
     

  • Delcker J, Ifenthaler D (2021) Teachers’ perspective on school development at German vocational schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technol Pedagogy Educ 30(1):125–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1857826

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dewey J (1910) How we think. Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dytham C (2017) Choosing and using statistics: a biologist’s guide, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken


    Google Scholar
     

  • Enke J, Glass R, Kreß A, Hambach J, Tisch M, Metternich J (2018) Industrie 4.0: competencies for a modern production system: a curriculum for learning factories. Procedia Manuf 23(2017):267–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.028

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ferrari A (2012) Digital competence in practice: an analysis of frameworks. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Ispra. https://doi.org/10.2791/82116

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fraillon J, Ainley J, Schulz W, Friedman T, Gebhardt E (2014) Preparing for life in a digital age. Springer Science+Business Media, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14222-7

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fraillon J, Ainley J, Schulz W, Duckworth D, Friedman T (2019) IEA international computer and information literacy study 2018: assessment framework. In: Fraillon J, Ainley J, Schulz W, Duckworth D, Friedman T (eds) IEA international computer and information literacy study 2018 assessment framework. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19389-8

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fritz CO, Morris PE, Richler JJ (2012) Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. J Exp Psychol Gen 141(1):2–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gebhardt J, Grimm A, Neugebauer LM (2015) Developments 4.0: prospects on future requirements and impacts on work and vocational education. J Tech Educ 3(2):117–133


    Google Scholar
     

  • Groß E, Siegert J, Bauernhansl T (2017) Changing requirements of competence building due to an increase of personalized products. Procedia Manuf 9:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.012

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gronau N, Ullrich A, Teichmann M (2017) Development of the industrial IoT competences in the areas of organization, process, and interaction based on the learning factory concept. Procedia Manuf 9:254–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.029

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15(9):1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hummel V, Hyra K, Ranz F, Schuhmacher J (2015) Competence development for the holistic design of collaborative work systems in the logistics learning factory. Procedia CIRP 32:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.111

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ifenthaler D (2018) How we learn at the digital workplace. In: Ifenthaler D (ed) Digital workplace learning—bridging formal and informal learning with digital technologies. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46215-8

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ilomäki L, Paavola S, Lakkala M, Kantosalo A (2016) Digital competence: an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Educ Inf Technol 21(3):655–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Johnson DW, Bartholomew KW, Miller D (2006) Improving computer literacy of business management majors: a case study. J Inf Technol Educ 5:77–94


    Google Scholar
     

  • Keselman HJ, Huberty CJ, Cribbie RA, Lowman LL, Lix LM, Donahue B, Petoskey MD, Olejnik S, Kowalchuk RK, Keselman JC, Levin JR (1998) Statistical practices of educational researchers: an analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses. Rev Educ Res 68(3):350–386. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003350

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kreimeier D, Morlock F, Prinz C, Krückhans B, Bakir DC (2014) Holistic learning factories: a concept to train lean management, resource efficiency as well as management and organization improvement skills. Procedia CIRP 17:184–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.040

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kroll S (2017) Technikberufe: Nicht immer nur reine Männersache. Berufsbildung in Zahlen 2:4–5


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lanza G, Minges S, Stoll J, Moser E, Haefner B (2016) Integrated and modular didactic and methodological concept for a learning factory. Procedia CIRP. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.06.107

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao HA (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 3:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liboni LB, Cezarino LO, Jabbour CJC, Oliveira BG, Stefanelli NO (2019) Smart industry and the pathways to HRM 4.0: implications for SCM. Supply Chain Manag 24(1):124–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2018-0150

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liebrecht C, Hochdörffer J, Treber S, Moser E, Erbacher T, Gidion G, Lanza G (2017) Concept development for the verification of the didactic competence promotion for the learning factory on global production. Procedia Manuf 9:315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.019

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin YT, Wen ML, Jou M, Wu DW (2014) A cloud-based learning environment for developing student reflection abilities. Comput Hum Behav 32:244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.014

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Löhr-Zeidler B, Hörner R, Heer J (2016) Handlungsempfehlungen Industrie 4.0. Umsetzungshilfen fürLehrerinnen und Lehrer der beruflichen Schulen. Berufsbildung. Berufsbildung 159:11–14


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mangiafico S (2020) Functions to support extension education program evaluation (Version 2.325). http://rcompanion.org/

  • Mayring P (2015) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz Pädagogik

  • Ministry for Economic Affairs, Work, and Housing of Baden-Wuerttemberg (2017) Förderung von “Lernfabriken 4.0” in Baden-Württemberg. https://wm.baden-wuerttemberg.de/fileadmin/redaktion/m-wm/intern/Dateien_Downloads/Innovation/Liste_Lernfabriken_4.0.pdf

  • Ministry for Economic Affairs, Work, and Housing of Baden-Wuerttemberg (2018) Wirtschaftsministerium fördert 21 “Lernfabriken 4.0” an beruflichen Schulen. Pressemitteilung. https://wm.baden-wuerttemberg.de/de/service/presse-und-oeffentlichkeitsarbeit/pressemitteilung/pid/wirtschaftsministerium-foerdert-21-lernfabriken-40-an-beruflichen-schulen/

  • Ministry for Economic Affairs, Work, and Housing of Baden-Wuerttemberg (2019) Wirtschaftsministerium fördert 21 “Lernfabriken 4.0″ an beruflichen Schulen. https://wm.baden-wuerttemberg.de/de/service/presse-und-oeffentlichkeitsarbeit/pressemitteilung/pid/wirtschaftsministerium-foerdert-21-lernfabriken-40-an-beruflichen-schulen/

  • Monostori L (2014) Cyber-physical production systems: roots, expectations and R&D challenges. Procedia CIRP 17:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.115

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Müller-Frommeyer LC, Aymans SC, Bargmann C, Kauffeld S, Herrmann C (2017) Introducing competency models as a tool for holistic competency development in learning factories: challenges, example and future application. Procedia Manuf 9:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.015

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nickolaus R (2019) Didaktik – Modelle und Konzepte beruflicher Bildung: Orientierungsleistungen für die Praxis, 5th edn. Hohengehren GmbH Verlag, Baltmannsweiler


    Google Scholar
     

  • Olejnik S, Algina J (2003) Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychol Methods 8(4):434–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pfeiffer S (2015) Effects of industry 4.0 on vocational education and training. ITA Manu:script 15(15–04):51. https://doi.org/10.1553/ITA-ms-15-04

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pittich D, Tenberg R, Lensing K (2020) Learning factories for complex competence acquisition. Eur J Eng Educ 45(2):196–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1567691

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reining N, Kauffeld S, Herrmann C (2019) Students’ interactions: using video data as a mean to identify competences addressed in learning factories. Procedia Manuf 31:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.001

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Richardson JTE (2011) Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educ Res Rev 6(2):135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rodgers C (2002) Defining reflection: another look at john dewey and reflective thinking. Teach Coll Rec 104(4):842–866

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roll M, Ifenthaler D (2020a) Competence development across different learning contexts in industry 4.0. In: Aprea C, Sappa V, Tenberg R (eds) Connectivity and integrative competence development in vocational and professional education and training, vol 29. Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 185–209


    Google Scholar
     

  • Roll M, Ifenthaler D (2020b) The impact of learning factories on multidisciplinary digital competencies. In: Wuttke E, Seifried J, Niegemann H (eds) VET and professional development in the age of digitalization. Barbara Budrich, Opladen, pp 23–38


    Google Scholar
     

  • Scheid R (2017) Kaufmännische Perspektiven der Lernfabriken in Baden-Württemberg. In: Wilbers K (ed) Industrie 4.0: Herausforderungen für die kaufmännische Bildung. epubli GmbH, Berlin, pp 93–108


    Google Scholar
     

  • Scheid R (2018) Learning factories in vocational schools: challenges for designing and implementing learning factories at vocational schools. In: Ifenthaler D (ed) Digital workplace learning: bridging formal and informal learning with digital technologies. Springer, Berlin, pp 271–289

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scheirer CJ, Ray WS, Hare N (1976) The analysis of ranked data derived from completely randomized factorial designs. Biometrics 32(2):429–434

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Selwyn N, Husen O (2010) The educational benefits of technological competence: an investigation of students’ perceptions. Eval Res Educ 23(2):137–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790.2010.483515

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sîmandl V, Dobias V, Sery M (2017) The influence of teaching methods on learners’ perception of e-safety. J Inf Technol Educ Innov Pract 16:253–275. https://doi.org/10.1519/R-21636.1

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (2001) Biometry, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman, New York


    Google Scholar
     

  • Statistic Office of Baden-Wuerttemberg (2019a) Classes and students at vocational schools since 1987/88. https://www.statistik-bw.de/BildungKultur/SchulenBerufl/1302516x.tab?R=LA

  • Statistic Office of Baden-Wuerttemberg (2019b) Students at vocational schools since 1952/53. https://www.statistik-bw.de/BildungKultur/SchulenBerufl/LRt0307.jsp

  • Stecken J, Linsinger M, Sudhoff M, Kuhlenkötter B (2019) Didactic concept for increasing acceptance of consistent data standards using the example of assistance systems in assembly. Procedia Manuf 31:277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.044

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stettes O (2018) Keine Angst vor Robotern: Beschäftigungseffekte der Digitalisierung – eine Aktualisierung frührer IW-Befunde. IW-Report, 11.

  • Tisch M, Metternich J (2017) Potentials and limits of learning factories in research, innovation transfer, education, and training. Procedia Manuf 9:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.027

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tisch M, Hertle C, Cachay J, Abele E, Metternich J, Tenberg R (2013) A systematic approach on developing action-oriented, competency-based learning factories. Procedia CIRP 7:580–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.036

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tisch M, Hertle C, Abele E, Metternich J, Tenberg R (2016) Learning factory design: a competency-oriented approach integrating three design levels. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 29(12):1355–1375. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2015.1033017

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Laar E, van Deursen A, van Dijk J, de Haan J (2017) The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: a systematic literature review. Comput Hum Behav 72:577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Veile JW, Kiel D, Müller JM, Voigt KI (2019) Lessons learned from industry 4.0 implementation in the German manufacturing industry. J Manuf Technol Manage 31(5):977–997. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2018-0270

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vuorikari R, Punie Y, Carretero S, Van Den Brande L (2016) DigComp 2.0: the digital competence framework for citizens. In: JRC Science for Policy Report. https://doi.org/10.2791/11517

  • Weinert FE (2001) Concept of competence: a conceptual clarification. In: Rychen DS, Salganik LH (eds) Defining and selecting key competencies. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Göttingen, pp 45–65


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilbers K (2017) Industrie 4.0 und Wirtschaft 4.0: Eine Chance für die kaufmännische Berufsbildung. In: Wilbers K (ed) Industrie 4.0: Herausforderungen für die kaufmännische Bildung. Epubli GmbH, Berlin, pp 9–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04883-9_4

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zinn B (2014) Lernen in aufwendigen technischen Real-Lernumgebungen: Eine Bestandsaufnahme zu berufsschulischen Lernfabriken. Die Berufsbildende Schule 66(1):23–26


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    Disclaimer:

    This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.

    Click here for Source link (https://www.springeropen.com/)