Introduction

Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) is one of the most common enteropathogenic virus in the swine industry, causing typical clinical symptoms characterized by acute diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration and even death in piglets (1, 2). It belongs to the genus Deltacoronavirus in the family Coronaviridae of the order Nidovirales (3). It’s an enveloped virus possessing a single-stranded positive-sense RNA genome of approximately 25.4 kb in size. The PDCoV genome arrangements are as follows: 5′ untranslated region (UTR), open reading frame 1a/1b (ORF1a/1b), spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), non-structural protein 6 (NS6), nucleocapsid (N), NS7, NS7a and 3′ UTR (4). ORF1a and ORF1b encompass the 5′-proximal two-thirds of the genome and encode two viral replicase precursor polyproteins, pp1a and pp1ab, which are predicted to be processed into non-structural proteins responsible for viral replication and transcription. The 3′-proximal last third of the genome codes for the four structural proteins (S, E, M and N), as well as at least three accessory proteins [NS6 (between the M and N genes), NS7 (within the N gene) and NS7a (within the N gene)] (57). A recent study found that PDCoV NS6 protein is expressed during infection in vivo and incorporated into PDCoV virions, inferring that NS6 protein is not only a PDCoV accessory protein but also a component associated with PDCoV virions (8).

PDCoV was first reported to be detected in pig rectal swabs in Hong Kong in 2012, when molecular surveillance studies were conducted to examine the diversity of coronaviruses in mammals and birds (9). PDCoV diarrhea broke out in the USA for the first time in early 2014 (3). Until now, PDCoV has been detected in many countries, such as South Korea, Japan and China (1012). Moreover, experimental infection studies confirmed that calves, chickens, turkey poults, mice are susceptible to infection with PDCoV, and independent infections of PDCoV among Haitian children have been reported (1317). Therefore, it is necessary to develop effective measures to prevent and control PDCoV.

A comprehensive understanding of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of PDCoV conduce to prevent PDCoV infection. This review focuses on the current knowledge on the prevalence, pathogenicity and infection dynamics, pathogenesis and immune evasion strategies of PDCoV, as well as existing methods of preventing and treating PDCoV and their corresponding mechanisms.

Prevalence of PDCoV

Deltacoronaviruse in pigs was discovered for the first time during the molecular surveillance study, named porcine coronavirus HKU15 (9). PDCoV diarrhea broke out for the first time in Ohio, USA in early 2014 (3). Soon, swine samples from farms in nine other USA States (Minnesota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, and Iowa) were also tested positive for PDCoV (4, 18). Until now, PDCoV has been detected in multiple countries, including Canada, China, South Korea, Thailand, Vietnam, Lao PDR, Japan, Mexico and Peru (10, 11, 1923). Retrospective researches revealed the presence of PDCoV in pigs before its first report in 2012. For example, Thachil et al. detected PDCoV IgG antibodies in serum samples collected in 2010 from USA farms (24). Dong et al. also found that two samples collected in 2004 from Anhui, China were positive for PDCoV (25). The majority of PDCoVs could be divided into four lineages based on the full genomes: the Thailand, Early China, USA, and China (26). The Thailand lineage contains strains from Vietnam, Laos, and Thailand. The Early China and China lineages contain strains only from China including CHN-AH-2004 (GenBank accession no. KP757890). The USA lineage contains strains from the USA, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Peru and China [AH2019/H (GenBank accession no. MN520198) and SD2019/426 (GenBank accession no. MN520191)] (22, 23, 26). Both the USA and China lineages are the major prevailing genotypes worldwide (26). The China lineage shows the largest genetic divergence, followed by the Thailand lineage, and the USA lineage indicates the least genetic divergence (27). More frequent intra- and inter-lineage recombination and higher virus genetic diversity in the China lineages compared with the USA lineage (26). In the China and Thailand lineages, recombination occurs frequently within ORF1ab, while strains from the USA lineage do not exhibit recombination within the full-length genome (26). According to existing studies, the positive rates of PDCoV in clinical samples of diarrheal pigs in different periods and regions are different, as shown in the Table 1.


www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The positive rate of PDCoV in clinical samples of diarrheal pigs in different periods and regions.

Pathogenicity and Infection Dynamics of PDCoV

Clinical Manifestation of PDCoV Infection

PDCoV can infect pigs of different ages, among which piglets are more susceptible (3, 12, 20, 3539). The typical clinical symptoms of PDCoV infection are characterized by acute and severe watery diarrhea, vomiting, and dehydration, sometimes accompanied by lethargy and anorexia (1, 12, 36, 40, 41). Generally, clinical signs develop at 1–2 days post-inoculation (dpi), and the progression of diarrhea is most severe at 3–7 dpi and the pigs gradually recover thereafter (12, 36, 4042).

Gross Lesions and Histological Lesions of PDCoV Infection

Currently, a majority of studies focus on necropsy of PDCoV-inoculated pigs at 3–7 dpi. Gross lesions mainly appear in the gastrointestinal tract, especially the small intestine, and are characterized by thin and transparent intestinal walls, accumulation of a large amount of yellow fluid in the intestinal lumen, and occasionally, coagulated milk in the stomach (12, 36, 40, 41, 43). One study reported that the infected pigs euthanized at 23–24 or 28 dpi showed no gross lesions (36).

Histological lesions are primarily observed in the jejunum and ileum. The typical histological lesions include multifocal to diffuse villous enterocyte swelling and vacuolation, and moderate to severe villous blunting and atrophy (12, 36, 39, 41, 42, 44). Villous enterocytes are mildly to moderately attenuated with sloughing enterocytes into the lumen. The villus height-to-crypt depth ratio decreases significantly. Occasionally, the lamina propria of the small intestine is hyperemic, or a small number of lymphocytes and neutrophils infiltrate the lamina propria (11, 3235). Several studies also found histologic lesions in the stomach, cecum, colon and lung (1, 36, 40). At 10–11 dpi, the intestinal tract exhibits varying degrees of recovery (39, 42).

Virus Distribution in PDCoV-Inoculated Pigs

As mentioned above, most of the current studies euthanize PDCoV-inoculated pigs at 3–7 dpi. Based on the above research conditions, PDCoV antigens were observed mainly in the small intestine, and the jejunum and ileum had more PDCoV antigen-positive enterocytes compared with the duodenum (12, 36, 40, 4244). Meanwhile, PDCoV antigens were generally observed in the cytoplasm of villous epithelial cells, but infrequently in crypt epithelial cells (12, 36, 40, 4244). PDCoV mainly aggregates in the duodenum in the early stage, while in the peak of stage and the later period, the virus transfers to ileum (42). Occasionally, a small number of PDCoV antigen-positive cells were detected in the cecum and colon (36, 39), and fewer PDCoV antigen-positive cells were detected in mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) (36), peyer’s patches (39) and stomach (45). One study reported that the percentage of pigs that tested positive for PDCoV antigen decreased significantly at 7–8 dpi, and no positive cells were detected in samples from 10 dpi and thereafter (39). PDCoV antigens were not observed in other organs, such as heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney and tonsil. However, different levels of PDCoV RNA were detected in multiple organs by RT-PCR. Although the strain and dose of the virus, the age of pigs or the time of euthanasia varied in different studies, PDCoV RNA was usually detected in the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, colon, liver, spleen, kidney, lung and MLN (2, 12, 3941, 45), and the quantities are relatively high in the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum and colon. Low to moderate quantities of viral RNA are occasionally detected in the rectum, stomach, diaphragm, heart, inguinal lymph node, tonsil and muscle from rear leg (41, 45). One study using 5-day-old piglets orally inoculated with PDCoV (CHN-GD16–05) with 5 mL at 108.6 TCID50/mL declared that viral RNA was detected from duodenum, jejunum, and ileum at the early stage. The small intestine had the highest viral copies in the middle stage. Afterwards, the virus could be detected in low quantities in ileums during the late stage while other tissue samples were negative (42). Vitosh-Sillman reported that most of the lymph node and small intestinal samples from pigs were moderately positive from day 6 to the end of the study at day 42 (39).

PDCoV infection can cause viremia (40). Some studies have detected PDCoV RNA in relatively low amounts in the serum or blood (40, 41), while others have not (1, 12). For example, Chen et al. inoculated 5-day-old piglets with the PDCoV cell culture isolate with the titer of 3 × 103 TCID50/mL (10 mL per pig). At 3 dpi, viral RNA was detected in 2 of 8 PDCoV inoculated pigs with the titer of 102.2-102.9 TCID50/mL. From 4 to 7 dpi, viral RNA was detected in serum of all pigs with the titer ranges of 100.5-103 TCID50/mL (41). Whereas, in the study performed by Jung et al. no PDCoV-inoculated pigs at 72–168 h post-inoculation (hpi) had detectable virus RNA in serum (1).

Fecal Viral Shedding and Specimen to Monitor Swine Herd Health

Based on experimental findings, fecal viral shedding occurs on 24–48 hpi, peaks at 2–7 dpi (12, 40, 41, 44, 45). Fecal viral RNA is still detectable at 14–35 dpi (12, 40). In addition to feces and tissue samples (especially intestines), oral fluids and environmental samples are also utilized to monitor or detect PDCoV. Evaluation of the association between the occurrence and specimen of PDCoV in diagnostic samples uncovers that oral fluids have the highest relative odds associated with PDCoV detection, indicating that oral fluids are useful for determining whether a swine herd is infected with PDCoV, and are a valuable tool for monitoring the health of swine herd. Besides, the relative odds of PDCoV detection in feces are higher than in fecal swabs and intestines (46).

PDCoV Infection in Species Other Than Pigs

Experimental infection studies show that calves, chickens, turkey poults, mice are susceptible to infection with PDCoV. PDCoV-inoculated chickens and turkey poults exhibit diarrhea, shed detectable viral RNA from the cloaca and trachea and have distended gastrointestinal tracts containing a mixture of yellow liquid and gas (15). Histological lesions are observed in the lung, kidney, and intestinal tissues of infected chickens (14, 15). Besides, Boley et al. assigned chickens or turkey poults from each uninfected group and allowed them to comingle with the infected group, and they found that PDCoV spread rapidly from infected to naive chickens or turkey poults (15). PDCoV-inoculated calves have prolonged viral RNA shedding, but show no clinical signs or obvious intestinal lesions, implying that the infectivity of PDCoV in calves is limited (13). PDCoV is also able to limitedly infect mice (16). PDCoV RNA is mainly detected in the intestine and lymphoid tissues of mice, while no similar symptoms are observed. Such asymptomatic infection may support these species as reservoirs of PDCoV to participate in further interspecific transmission (16). Moreover, PDCoV is identified in plasma samples of three Haitian children with acute undifferentiated febrile illness, and Vero E6 cells inoculated with plasma from one patient show non-specific CPE at 11 dpi (17).

Pathogenesis of PDCoV

Receptor Binding and Cellular Entry

LLC-PK cells in general are more susceptible to PDCoV infection than ST cells (47, 48). One replication cycle of PDCoV takes 5–6 h (49). Both PDCoV genomes and viral titers reach a peak at 24 hpi, after which a plateau is reached (50). The prerequisite of coronavirus infection is its entrance into the host cell. Coronavirus entry is a multi-step process involving viral attachment and fusion of viral and cellular membranes, which relies on the interaction between coronavirus S proteins and specific receptors on host cell surfaces. PDCoV S protein is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein that contains three receptor-binding S1 subunits and three membrane fusion S2 subunits (51, 52). PDCoV receptor has not been clearly elucidated, and there are many controversies about whether aminopeptidase N (APN, also called CD13) is the receptor for PDCoV (16, 5357). Transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) employs APN as its receptor (58).

After binding to the receptor, conformational changes occur between S1 and S2, exposing the cleavage site to proteases. The host protease or exogenous protease cleaves the spike, releasing the spike fusion peptide and facilitating virus entry. Zhang et al. reported that cathepsin L and cathepsin B in lysosomes and exogenous trypsin in cell cultures independently induce PDCoV S protein cleavage and fusion, uncovering two distinct PDCoV entry pathways: one through cathepsin L and cathepsin B in the endosome and another via a protease at the cell surface. Trypsin activates membrane fusion induced by S protein in ST cells, and Arg-672 in the S protein is critical for trypsin-induced cell fusion (59). Yang et al. confirmed that trypsin does not affect PDCoV entry into LLC-PK cells and ST cells, but enhances cell-to-cell fusion in a cell type-dependent manner at a late stage of the viral infection to promote PDCoV replication (47). PDCoV enters IPI-2I cells via macropinocytosis independent of specific receptors and clathrin-mediated endocytosis dependent on a low-pH environment and dynamin rather than caveola-mediated endocytosis (60). The endocytotic markers Rab5 and Rab7, but not Rab11, regulated PDCoV endocytosis. Nonetheless, the caveola-mediated endocytosis is utilized by PDCoV to enter ST cells and LLC-PK1 cells. APN and PDCoV virions are co-localized with Rab5, Rab7, and LAMP1, implying that APN mediates PDCoV entry by an endocytotic pathway (61). No matter which receptor engages, only entry by an endocytotic route ultimately leads to efficient viral replication. Additionally, the cholesterol in the cell membrane and viral envelope is a key component for viral entry (62).

Cellular Factors Involved in PDCoV Infection

Effective viral infection depends on the host cell machinery. Virus orchestrates numerous cellular processes to benefit its replication. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway converts extracellular stimuli into a wide range of cellular responses. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK, also known as p42/44 MAPK), Janus kinase (JNK, also known as stress activated protein kinase-1, SAPK1) and p38 MAP kinase (also known as SAPK2/RK) are three major MAPK signaling pathways in mammals. Viruses utilize MAPK signaling pathways to manipulate cellular functions for their own benefit. Pharmacologic inhibition of MAPK signaling pathways exhibits antiviral efficacy, representing a potential therapy. PDCoV activates the ERK signaling pathway to promote its replication and viral attachment is responsible for monophasic ERK activation (63). Pharmacological inhibition of ERK activation has no effect on viral entry but impairs the post-entry steps of PDCoV replication cycle, including viral RNA synthesis, viral protein translation, and viral progeny production. ERK1/2 activation is irrelevant to PDCoV-induced apoptosis. Recently, our in vitro study found that PDCoV activates p38 signaling pathway to favor its replication (64). Later, we employed piglet models and illustrated that phosphorylated p38 levels in jejunum and ileum of PDCoV-infected piglets upregulated (2). Jeon et al. confirmed that JNK1/2 and p38 were involved in the replication of PDCoV by affecting viral biosynthesis and progeny release (65). Remarkably, pharmacological inhibition of JNK1/2 or p38 activation alters the synthesis of cytokines during PDCoV infection. For example, the mRNA levels of IL-1α, TNF-α and IFN-β were decreased, while the mRNA levels of IL-13, IL-7 and IFN-γ were increased, highlighting the regulatory effect of JNK1/2 and p38 signaling pathway on immune response during PDCoV infection.

NF-κB signaling pathway is a key mediator of cytokines and plays a central role in the host response to viral infection. PDCoV infection activates the NF-κB signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo (2, 64). However, persistent activation of NF-κB signaling pathway can trigger inflammation by stimulating the expression of vast cytokines.

When faced with viral infection, host cells use autophagy to transport viruses to the lysosomal compartment for degradation and elimination. Some viruses have evolved multiple strategies to hijack autophagy in favor to replication. Our recent study using LLC-PK1 cell models and piglet models of PDCoV infection reveals that PDCoV-induced autophagy facilitates virus replication, and the p38 signaling pathway mediates this process (66). However, which protein of PDCoV is the key inducer of autophagy has not been identified.

The host can eliminate virus-infected cells through apoptosis. However, some viruses trigger apoptosis to promote dissemination of viral progeny and cause cytopathic effect in vitro and/or tissue damage in vivo. PDCoV infection stimulates mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization either via Bax recruitment or mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening to permit the release of apoptogenic mitochondrial cytochrome c into the cytoplasm, thereby leading to the caspase-dependent intrinsic apoptosis to facilitate viral replication (67). Our study reveals that PDCoV infection induces apoptosis in both LLC-PK1 cells and piglet intestines, and the p38 signaling pathway is involved in PDCoV-induced caspase-dependent apoptosis (2, 64). However, Jung et al. reports that PDCoV induces apoptosis in ST and LLC-PK1 cells in vitro but not in infected intestinal enterocytes in vivo (68). Piglet age and necropsy time may be responsible for this discrepancy, and further investigation need to be carried out.

Ionic calcium (Ca2+) is a versatile intracellular second messenger. PDCoV modulates calcium influx to facilitate replication. The Ca2+ channel blocker diltiazem hydrochloride inhibits PDCoV infection targeting the replication step of the viral replication cycle. Knockdown of the L-type Ca2+ voltage-gated channel subunit CACNA1S also restricts PDCoV replication (69). Cholesterol 25-hydroxylase (CH25H), a key enzyme regulating cholesterol metabolism, is regarded as a broad host antiviral factor. PDCoV infection remarkably increases the expression of CH25H in IPI-FX cells, and CH25H plays a negative role in PDCoV infection in a manner that is not entirely dependent on its enzyme activity (70). Additionally, proteomic analysis of cells indicates that PDCoV upregulated proteins are enriched in PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, and downregulated proteins are enriched in the mTOR signaling pathway. PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway plays an important role in many physiological and pathological conditions, and may be key adaptor molecules in inhibiting viral replication (71).

Immune Evasion of PDCoV

PDCoV infection observably upregulate genes associated with the RIG-I-like receptor signaling pathway, toll-like receptor signaling pathway and so on (44, 71). These pathways are responsible for sensing of the invading viral RNA and activating downstream signaling cascades to produce cytokines. PDCoV infection induces the expression of IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-γ, IFN-λ1, IL-22, IL- 1β, IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α and IFN-λ1 in vitro or in vivo (2, 44, 48, 50, 64, 72). Coinfection with PDCoV and PEDV has a synergetic effect on the regulation of cytokines (73, 74). In the case of PDCoV-PEDV coinfection, the expressions of IFN-α, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12 and TNF-α are significantly up-regulated compared with single PDCoV infection. Meanwhile, PDCoV has evolved diversiform escape strategies to interfere with the host’s innate immunity (Figure 1). PDCoV nsp5 inhibits IFN-β production by cleavage NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO) at the cleavage site of glutamine 231 (Q231) (75). This is similar to the mechanism by which porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) nsp5 inhibits IFN-β production, implying that the same IFN antagonistic mechanism may be common to members of the Coronaviridae family (76). Moreover, PDCoV nsp5 antagonizes type I IFN signaling by cleaving signal transducer and activator of transcription 2 (STAT2) at two residues, Q685 and Q758, and the protease activity of nsp5 determines STAT2 cleavage (77). PDCoV nsp15 inhibits IFN-β production by destroying NF-κB activation via an endoribonuclease activity-independent mechanism, but does not antagonize interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) activation (78). PDCoV NS6 interacts with RIG-I/MDA5, which in turn interferes with the binding of RIG-I/MDA5 to double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), resulting in the reduction of RLR-mediated IFN-β production (79). Whereas, Deng et al. removed NS6 from the infectious clone of PDCoV and found that the deletion of NS6 did not affect the ability of the infectious clone virus to inhibit the type I IFN responses, implying that NS6 does not act as an IFN antagonist during PDCoV infection (80). PDCoV NS7a competes with tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 3 (TRAF3) and IRF3 for binding to IκB kinase ε (IKKε) by interacting with the kinase domain and the scaffold dimerization domain of IKKε simultaneously, forming an antagonistic effect on RLR-mediated IFN-β production (81). PDCoV N protein is also an IFN antagonist. It interacts with the helicase domain and the C-terminal domain of RIG-I, impairs dsRNA and protein activator of protein kinase R (PACT) binding to RIG-I, and ultimately antagonizes IFN-β production (82). The N-terminal region (1-246 aa) of N protein is critical for the interaction between N protein and RIG-I. Besides, N protein inhibits RIG-I K63-linked polyubiquitination by disrupting the binding of Riplet (an important activator for RIG-I by mediating the K63-linked polyubiquitination) to RIG-I, thus hampering the production of IFN-β (83). N protein also suppresses IRF7-induced type I interferon production via ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation pathway. It interacts with porcine IRF7 in a species-specific manner and promotes IRF7 degradation mostly through the K6, K11, and K29-linked polyubiquitination. Lysine 359 of IRF7 was a key site for N protein to induce IRF7 degradation (84). PDCoV infection also antagonizes IFN-λ1 production by decreasing the number of peroxisomes without altering the expression levels of IRF1 and mitochondrial antiviral-signaling (MAVS) (85). Peroxisome is the platform for MAVS to activate IRF1, and peroxisome-localized MAVS is associated with the production of IFN-λs.


www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The mechanism of PDCoV interfered with IFN response. dsRNA, double-strand RNA; RIG-I, retinoic acid-inducible gene I; MDA5, melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5; PACT, protein activator of protein kinase R; TRIM25, tripartite motif containing 25; MAVS, mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein; TRAF3, tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factor; TBK1, TANK-binding kinase 1; IKK, IκB kinase; IRF, interferon regulatory factor; NEMO, NF-κB essential modulator; IκB, NF-κB inhibitor; NF-κB, nuclear factor-kappaB; IFNAR, IFN-α/β receptor; TYK2, tyrosine kinase 2; JAK1, Janus kinase 1; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; ISG, interferon-stimulated gene.

Current Anti-PDCoV Strategies

At present, there is little information about commercially available drugs or vaccines for PDCoV. Antiviral reagents mainly have two types of inhibition mechanisms: (i) targeting the virus themselves or (ii) targeting host factors. Virus-targeting antiviral agents can impede viral replication process or suppress the biological functions of viral proteins, mainly enzyme activities. PDCoV replication begins with the viral attachment and entry. After that, the virus uncoats and begins translation, transcription, RNA and protein synthesis, assembly, maturation and release. Disruption of any of these processes can impair viral replication. Host-targeting antiviral agents target host factors involved in PDCoV infection, regulating the function of the immune system or other cellular processes. Such agents have advantages in reducing viral resistance and managing viral emergencies.

Remdesivir is a monophosphoramidate prodrug of an adenosine analog that has efficient antiviral ability against a range of RNA viruses by targeting viral RNA dependent RNA polymerase, which is required for viral RNA synthesis. Treatment with remdesivir diminishes PDCoV replication in a dose-dependent manner with an EC50 value of 0.02 μM in Huh7 cells cultured in TPCK trypsin-containing and serum-free media (86). However, the inhibitory effects are not obvious in LLC-PK1 cells. This may be due to the lack of cellular processes required for the antiviral activity of remdesivir in LLC-PK1 cells. Lithium chloride (LC) and diammonium glycyrrhizinate (DG) exert anti-PDCoV activities at the early stage of PDCoV replication, and DG but not LC inhibits viral attachment (87). Furthermore, both drugs attenuated PDCoV-induced apoptosis in LLC-PK1 cells. Rhodanine derivative LJ001 possesses effective inhibitory ability at the replication stage of PDCoV life cycle in ST cells. It restricts the synthesis of viral RNA and protein, and reduces viral production (88). 25-hydroxycholesterol (25HC), the product of cholesterol oxidation by the enzyme CH25H, inhibits PDCoV infection by blocking PDCoV entry (70). Bile acids chenodeoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid suppress PDCoV replication at post-entry stages by inducing the production of IFN-λ3 and IFN-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15). Lithocholic acid functions through a G protein-coupled receptor-IFN-λ3-ISG15 signaling axis in IPEC-J2 cells (89). Melatonin and structural analogs, including indole, tryptamine and L-tryptophan possess antiviral activities against PDCoV. Further studies ascertain that melatonin exerts antiviral effects at the early stage of viral replication with no effect on viral attachment but an effect on viral entry (90). Our group found that ergosterol peroxide (EP) exhibits anti-PDCOV activities targeting viral attachment, viral entry, and the early and middle stages of PDCoV replication in vitro, and protects piglets from PDCoV infection to a large extent (2, 64, 66). Inhibition of PDCoV-induced p38 activation is one of the mechanisms by which EP inhibits viral replication. Furthermore, EP inactivates PDCoV infectivity directly. This inhibition occurs before the virus invades host cells, which is an important direction to develop antiviral drugs. EP also ameliorates PDCoV-induced apoptosis and autophagy, and displays immunomodulatory capacity due to its suppression of NF-κB during PDCoV infection. In vivo study demonstrates that EP also enhances tight junction protein expressions in the small intestine.

Strategies for PDCoV vaccine development include inactivated virus vaccines, plasmids expressing shRNAs, live-attenuated virus vaccines and virus-like particles (VLPs). An inactivated PDCoV vaccine was prepared by inactivating the 15th generation virus of PDCoV strain NH with β-propiolactone containing aluminum hydroxide adjuvant at a 1:1 ratio, and pregnant sows were vaccinated at Houhai acupoint using a prime/boost strategy 20 and 40 days before delivery (91). The inactivated vaccine induced PDCoV S-specific IgG and neutralizing antibody (NA) responses in immunized sows and piglets from immunized sows, and exhibited 87.1% protective efficacy in the piglets which were orally challenged with PDCoV strain NH (105 TCID50/piglet) at 5 days post-farrowing. Gao et al. developed inactivated PDCoV vaccines by mixing binary ethyleneimine-inactivated cell culture-adapted CH/XJYN/2016 P30 with 206 adjuvant or Imject™ Alum Adjuvant (92). Gu et al. found that short hairpin RNAs targeting M and N genes diminished PDCoV replication in ST cells and proposed that RNA interference (RNAi) is a promising new strategy against PDCoV infection (93). Hereafter, a double-shRNA-expression plasmid specific to N gene, named pSil-double-shRNA-N1, were designed by Gu et al. (94). Zhang et al. replaced the NS6 gene of a full-length infectious cDNA clone of PDCoV with a green fluorescent protein (GFP) to generate rPDCoV-ΔNS6-GFP (95). rPDCoV-ΔNS6-GFP exhibited a decrease in viral yield in vitro and in vivo, and rPDCoV-ΔNS6-GFP infected piglets showed hardly detectable clinical symptoms or intestinal lesions. These results indicate that NS6 protein is an important virulence factor of PDCoV, providing a potential candidate for the development of live-attenuated virus vaccine. VLPs are non-genetic multimeric nanoparticles synthesized through in vitro or in vivo self-assembly of one or more viral structural proteins. Guo et al. synthesized chimeric VLP vaccines of the phage Qbeta coat protein presenting the universal epitope of coronavirus (96). The chimeric VLP vaccines induced NA responses against MHV, PEDV and PDCoV in mice.

Conclusion

PDCoV is a novel swine enteropathogenic coronavirus with worldwide distribution, causing great economic losses to pig industry. PDCoV can also infect calves, chickens, turkeys, mice, and even humans, emphasizing its possible ability to cross interspecies barriers. Its rapid dissemination and potential cross-species transmissibility impose a huge burden on animal and human health safety. In the past 20 years, as several coronaviruses have crossed the species barrier to infect humans and new coronaviruses have emerged, serious diseases have broken out. Therefore, global vigilance against coronavirus-related diseases needs to be strengthened. Grasping the epidemical situation, pathogenesis and immune escape strategies of PDCoV is essential for intervention in PDCoV infection, and it is even possible to discover some common signaling pathways and key molecules of coronaviruses. In addition, this review summarizes the current research status of drugs and vaccines against PDCoV, providing valuable clues for the screening of PDCoV drugs and the design of new prevention strategies.

Author Contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Professor Jiufeng Wang of China Agricultural University for helpful comments on the manuscript and the editor of MogoEdit for editing the manuscript.

References


Disclaimer:

This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.

Click here for Source link (https://www.frontiersin.org/)