Study design

This is an RCT (Fig. 2) with a 9-month intervention and a 3-month follow-up. This program will consist of two arms: the intervention group (BCW-based interactive pictorial health education program) and the control group (routine community lecture health education). Prior to the trial, we completed the final draft of the BCW-based interactive pictorial health education program through medical staff and patient interviews and the Delphi method. A pre-experiment was conducted to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention and research procedures in hypertensive patients with low health literacy in Huzhou, Zhejiang, China. We obtained informed consent from each study participant. The results of the two studies have been used to inform the development of the forthcoming trial.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Overview of the study procedure


The participants will be recruited from the community settings in Huzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. First, one of the municipal districts in Huzhou will be randomly selected, and then two communities with similar conditions within the district will be screened and selected. Finally, the two communities will be randomly allocated to the intervention group and the control group. Subjects meeting the inclusion criteria will be enrolled into the intervention group and the control group after informed consent is obtained. In addition, we will contact community health providers to participate in the study to ensure the cooperation of participants.

Recruitment and study population

Our researchers will give out recruitment leaflets in the two selected communities. Health care providers in each community will also help introduce eligible individuals to our study. Three trained researchers will participate in an in-person interview to screen individuals who show interest for eligibility. All participants will be fully informed of the study protocol first and will only be included in this study upon signing informed consent before baseline measurements are taken. They will receive a gift for the completion of each session and each data collection stage. In addition, those who have a severe mental disorder or cognitive impairment at present, or who experience adverse events during the intervention or follow-up period will be withdrawn from the study. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are as follows.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Aged ≥ 18 years and have lived in Huzhou for at least half a year

  • Diagnosed as hypertensive according to the 2018 Chinese Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension, systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg

  • Chinese High Blood Pressure-Health Literacy Scale (C-HBP-HL) score < 40 points

  • No major stress events (e.g., the death of relatives) within the past 6 months

  • Able to communicate in Mandarin, voluntarily participating in the study, and signing the informed consent of research intention

  • At least one modifiable cardiovascular risk factor

Exclusion criteria:

Randomization and blinding

Sequence generation

After completing the screening of the two communities with similar size, educational background and economic income, randomization will be performed at the level of the community after recruitment is completed. One community will be randomized to receive the intervention, and the other community will be randomized to the control group by throwing dice. The randomization process will be completed by a third party unrelated to the study. Only after the subjects have completed the baseline data collection, the allocation personnel can inform the researchers of the allocation results.

Allocation concealment

Participants and the trial coordinator will not be blinded to their group allocation; however, the data collectors and the data analyst will be blinded. The codes will be broken following statistical analysis.

Sample size calculation

The Gpower3.1.9.2 software was used to conduct the sample size calculation. The sample size was estimated by power analysis using the Chinese high blood pressure-health literacy scale for the evaluation of HBP-HL as a primary outcome measure of the study. Cohen’s d and the effect sizes were calculated for between-group differences of means of the level of HBP-HL using an independent-groups pre-test and post-test design. From the evidence of our pilot study, the HBP-HL score of the intervention group was 32.09 ± 4.89 points, and that of the control group was 27.80 ± 4.78 points, which led to an estimate effect size as 0.405. The analysis, with a two-sided test using β = 0.2, α = 0.05, two sample t-test, and repeated ANOVA, requires a total sample size of 108 participants. Considering a 10% dropout rate, our final sample size comes to 120 participants (60 participants for both the intervention and control groups).


Participants in each group will be divided into 3 teams of 15–20 people. Intensive intervention will be carried out for 9 months and twice a month in the first 2 months. During the other months, the intervention will be conducted once a month. Later, 3 months of follow-up will be conducted over telephone once a month and hypertension-related knowledge and videos (Putonghua and Huzhou dialect version) will be sent to the WeChat group once a week. Intermediary data will be collected at the 6th and 9th months to obtain timely feedback, to correct deviations, and to monitor and ensure the successful implementation of the intervention.

Intervention group

Interactive pictorial health education content (see Table 1) is drawn up according to 9 intervention functions of BCW theory that may stimulate behavioral change through several mechanisms of action.

Table 1 Description of intervention content based on BCW theory

A pictorial map will be used to visualize the content of health education and to guide the steps of the content, which is more acceptable for hypertensive patients with low HBP-HL. On the pictorial map, the size of which is 1 × 1.2 m, the text is written in a large, bold font to accommodate low functional health literacy levels and eyesight. The navigation arrows on the map indicate the steps of the intervention.

The educational content was developed by researchers based on a review of previous related research and programs and focused on medication, diet, exercise and weight management, sleep and psychological regulation, and knowledge of blood pressure monitoring and complications. Five experts evaluated the content of the health education program. The expert group consisted of cardiology, nursing, psychology, and pharmacology professors. The participants will use drawing implements to mark their progression through the educational content. The pictorial map will guide interactive discussions, which will facilitate the participants’ ability to acquire knowledge about hypertension. At the beginning of each intervention, educators will organize all participants to sit around the pictorial map in a U-shape. Each theme on the map comes with a set of questions that will be used as a framework by the facilitator to lead the discussion. In addition, the participants are encouraged to find the elements on the picture according to the theme and questions, guide the topic of development gradually through the corresponding content, and discuss with each other to deepen their understanding and memory. For example, the first question when using the map is to ask if they know the complications of hypertension. Ultimately, educators will guide everyone to review all the content discussed in the activity and answer the questions that they have not discussed yet to help participants sort out and consolidate the knowledge gained during the session.

Control group

The control group will only receive routine community lecture health education sessions, 9 months of intervention, and 3 months of follow-up.

Outcomes and measuring instruments

Sociodemographic questionnaire

The questionnaire is a self-administered survey including age, gender, education, occupation, financial status, marital status, living condition, insurance status, smoking and alcohol status, history of hypertension, family history of hypertension, types of blood pressure medications, self-test blood pressure status, and complications.


We will calculate the proportion of participants completing the intervention. Attendance will be examined as the proportion of participants who attend 9/11 sessions and the average number of sessions attended. At the end of each intervention session, a 5-point Likert scale (not at all to very much) will be used to rate all participants to gauge their level of satisfaction with the project and their mental and social engagement. At the 3-month follow-up assessment, participants will indicate their level of interest in participating in the project in the future and whether they would recommend it to others.

Outcome evaluation scales

Chinese high blood pressure-health literacy scale (C-HBP-HLS) [30]

This scale is divided into 5 dimensions (Print Health Literacy, Medication Label, Understanding Ability, Newest Vital Sign Test, and Avoiding Food Allergy) consisting of 15 items, which was translated into Chinese and validated by Zhang Q et al. in 2016. According to the test of functional health literacy in adults (TOFHLA) scoring system, the final total score range is 0–60 points, and the higher the score is, the higher the HL level is. Furthermore, according to the TOFHLA classification criteria, the final score of the HBP-HL scale is divided into 3 grades: a total score < 32 points reflects a lack of HBP-HL; a total score ranging from 32 to 40 points indicates an intermediate level of HBP-HL; and a total score ≥ 40 points represents a high level of HBP-HL. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the scale was 0.78, and the retest reliability was 0.96.

Hypertensive patients’ self-management behavior rating scale (HPSMBRS) [31]

This scale was developed and validated by F Zhao, Q et al. in 2012 and consists of 33 items in 6 dimensions (medication management, condition monitoring, diet management, exercise management, work and rest management, emotional management). The final total score ranges from 33 to 165 points. Higher scores reflect a better self-management behavior level in hypertensive patients. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the scale was 0.914, and the content validity was 0.910.

Chinese SF-36 health survey [32]

The SF-36 has nine evaluation items, including physiological function, physiological function, physical pain, general health status, social function, emotional function, mental health, vitality, and one self-assessment of health changes. The total score is 145. The higher the score, the better the health-related quality of life.

Chronic disease self-management program (CDSMP) [33]

This program was developed by Lorig of Stanford University in 2001 during research on the self-management behavior of patients with chronic diseases. The scale includes 6 items using a 1–10 grade scoring method: level 1 means no confidence, level 10 means full confidence, the total average score of 6 items is scored, and the total score of the scale is 1–10, including 2 dimensions (symptom management self-efficacy, disease common management self-efficacy). The higher the score, the higher the level of self-efficacy. The total score of self-efficacy can be divided into three levels (low level: total score < 5, medium level: 5 ≤ total score < 7, high level: total score ≥ 7).

Perceived social support scale [34]

The scale is divided into 3 dimensions and 12 items, mainly including family support, friend support and other support. The scale adopts the scoring method from 1 to 7, and the higher the score is, the higher the social support level of participants.

Clinical measurements

Blood pressure will be measured by the same surveyor with an Omron HEM-7211 electronic sphygmomanometer after the patient has rested quietly for at least 5 min. The measurement will be repeated at intervals of at least 5 min, and the average of the two readings will be recorded.

Anthropometric measurements, including height (cm), weight (kg), neck circumference (NC) (cm), waist circumference (WC) (cm), and hip circumference (cm), will be measured by researchers for all participants in lightweight clothing and bare feet. Body weight will be obtained using an Omron HBF-214 electronic scale, height will be reported by participants, and NC, WC, and hip circumference will be measured using a clinical tape measure. The parameters will be measured and recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm or 0.1 kg. Body mass index (BMI) is referred to as weight (kg)/height (m)2. According to the Working Group on Obesity in China, BMI is divided into normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 24 kg/m2), overweight (24 ≤ BMI < 28 kg/m2), and obesity (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2) [35]. NC is determined by measuring the horizontal circumference of the neck between the lower margin of the thyroid cartilage (Adam’s apple) and the upper margin of the 7th cervical vertebra. WC is measured at the midpoint between the lateral anterior superior iliac spine and the lower border of the tenth rib. Using criteria from the WHO for the Chinese population, a WC ≥ 90 cm for men and ≥ 80 cm for women is considered abdominal obesity [36].

Measurements will be taken at baseline and at 6, 9, and 12 months from trial entry (the detailed timeline is shown in Table 2). To decrease the dropout rate, some retention strategies will be carried out: (1) collecting contact information of participants and their family members, (2) distributing a gift for every participant at each event, and (3) providing a quiet and comfortable environment for the intervention. In addition, the measurements will be collected by designated and appropriately trained and blinded assessors.

Table 2 Summary of study assessments and timelines

Data management

Data from the two stages of the study will be stored in a password-protected computer folder in the researcher’s office, where no one else is allowed to enter. Postgraduate students will be responsible for collecting, coding, analyzing, and recording the data; however, the Supervising Committee composed of community health care providers who have no competing interests with the sponsor and who will monitor the whole process. Only the research team will have access to the data.

Statistical analysis

The SPSS 23.0 software will be used for data processing and statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics will be used to process sociodemographic data, of which observable variables are presented as the means ± standard deviations for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Exploratory analysis will be applied to examine the distribution of data. Baseline data comparisons between the two groups will be conducted using the chi–square (χ2) test (for categorical variables) and t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test (for continuous variables). 2(group)× 3(time) ANOVA is used for data with a normal distribution and homogeneity of variance, and a generalized estimation equation is used for data with a nonnormal distribution to determine the main effect of intervention factors, time factors, and interaction between group factors and time factors. Simple effects will be further analyzed when there are interaction effects. A two-tailed P < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Dropouts and missing data

Reasons for dropouts will be documented and reported. If patients are alive and missing at random, we will use multiple imputation methods based on ten imputed datasets with multiple imputation by chained equations [37].

Quality control

In collaboration with community health care providers before the trial entry, health care providers in each community are responsible for monitoring patient recruitment, consent, and collection of measurements. All researchers will be trained uniformly. To prevent bias, the data will be collected with unified measurements and analytical instruments by designated personnel (not the researcher himself) who are not clearly conducting the grouping. As soon as a questionnaire is completed, it will be strictly screened, and if there is any missing data, it will be completed in time. All data collection will be completed, encoded, and inputted by two people, and questionnaires with obvious errors will be removed. Epidata3.1 will be used to establish the database, randomly check and review it at a rate of 10%, and detect errors and correct them in a timely manner.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.


This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.

Click here for Source link (