• Bond, L., & Nolan, T. (2011). Making sense of perceptions of risk of diseases and vaccinations: A qualitative study combining models of health beliefs, decision-making and risk perception. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 943. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-943

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bürkner, P.-C. (2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bürkner, P.-C. (2018). Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R Package brms. The R Journal, 10(1), 395. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-017

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., Brubaker, M., Guo, J., Li, P., & Riddell, A. (2017). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v076.i01

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). J&J/Janssen Update. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/JJUpdate.html

  • Dragicevic, P., & Jansen, Y. (2017). Blinded with science or informed by charts? A replication study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(1), 781–790.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Ubel, P. A., Jankovic, A., Derry, H. A., & Smith, D. M. (2007). Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the subjective numeracy scale. Medical Decision Making, 27(5), 672–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X07304449

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fansher, M., Adkins, T. J., & Shah, P. (2022). Graphs do not lead people to infer causation from correlation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied.

  • Funk, C., & Tyson, A. (2021). Growing Share of Americans Say They Plan To Get a COVID-19 Vaccine—or Already Have. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2021/03/05/growing-share-of-americans-say-they-plan-to-get-a-covid-19-vaccine-or-already-have/

  • Gabry, J., Simpson, D., Vehtari, A., Betancourt, M., & Gelman, A. (2019). Visualization in Bayesian workflow. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 182(2), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12378

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Galesic, M., Garcia-Retamero, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2009). Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: Overcoming low numeracy. Health Psychology, 28(2), 210.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Garcia-Retamero, R., & Galesic, M. (2009). Communicating treatment risk reduction to people with low numeracy skills: a cross-cultural comparison. American Journal of Public Health, 99(12), 2196–2202.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Garcia-Retamero, R., & Galesic, M. (2010). Who proficts from visual aids: Overcoming challenges in people’s understanding of risks. Social Science & Medicine., 70(7), 1019–1025.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Garcia-Retamero, R., Galesic, M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2010). Do icon arrays help reduce denominator neglect? Medical Decision Making, 30(6), 672–684.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2013). Communicating health risks with visual aids. Current Directions in Psychological Science., 22(5), 392–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hawley, S. T., Zikmund-Fisher, B., Ubel, P., Jancovic, A., Lucas, T., & Fagerlin, A. (2008). The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Education and Counseling, 73(3), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.023.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kühberger, A., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., & Perner, J. (2002). Framing decisions: Hypothetical and real. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(2), 1162–1175.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Landy, D., Silbert, N., & Goldin, A. (2013). Estimating large numbers. Cognitive Science, 37(5), 775–799.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of effect existence and significance in the Bayesian framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2767. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Okan, Y., Garcia-Retamero, R., Cokely, E. T., & Maldonado, A. (2012). Individual differences in graph literacy: Overcoming denominator neglect in risk comprehension. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 390–401.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Padilla, L. M., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Hegarty, M., & Stefanucci, J. K. (2018). Decision making with visualizations: A cognitive framework across disciplines. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), 1–25.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Peters, E. (2012). Beyond comprehension: The role of numeracy in judgments and decisions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429960

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Philip Bump. (2021). The risk-reward calculus of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, visualized. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/04/13/risk-reward-calculus-johnson-johnson-vaccine-visualized/

  • Recchia, G., Lawrence, A. C., & Freeman, A. L. (2022). Investigating the presentation of uncertainty in an icon array: A randomized trial. PEC Innovation, 1, 100003.

  • Reyna, V. F. (2004). How people make decisions that involve risk: A dual-processes approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00275.x

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reyna, V. F. (2008). A theory of medical decision making and health: Fuzzy trace theory. Medical Decision Making, 28(6), 850–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X08327066

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ruiz, J. G., Andrade, A. D., Garcia-Retamero, R., Anam, R., Rodriguez, R., & Sharit, J. (2013). Communicating global cardiovascular risk: Are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk? Patient Education and Counseling, 93(3), 394–402.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Slovic, P & Weber, E.U. (2002, April 12-13). Perception of risk posed by extreme events [Paper presentation]. Risk Management strategies in an Uncertain World, Palisades, New York, USA. https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/chrr/documents/meetings/roundtable/white_papers/slovic_wp.pdf.

  • Slovic, P., & Weber, E. (2010). Perception of risk posed by extreme events. In J. S. Applegate, J. G. Laitos, J. M. Gaba, and N. M. Sachs (Eds.), Regulation of Toxic Substances and Hazardous Waste (2nd edition). Foundation Press.

  • Slovic, P., Monahan, J., & MacGregor, D. G. (2000). Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior, 24(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005595519944

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tait, A. R., Voepel-Lewis, T., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Fagerlin, A. (2010). The effect of format on parents’ understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: A comparison between text, tables, and graphics. Journal of Health Communication, 15(5), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.492560

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tal, A., & Wansink, B. (2016). Blinded with science: Trivial graphs and formulas increase ad persuasiveness and belief in product efficacy. Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 117–125.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., & Gabry, J. (2017). Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Statistics and Computing, 27(5), 1413–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., & Bürkner, P. C. (2021). Rank-normalization, folding, and localization: An improved ̂R for assessing convergence of MCMC (with Discussion). Bayesian analysis, 16(2), 667–718.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Walker, A. C., Stange, M., Dixon, M. J., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2022). Using icon arrays to communicate gambling information reduces the appeal of scratch card games. Journal of Gambling Studies, 1–20.

  • Waters, E. A., Weinstein, N. D., Colditz, G. A., & Emmons, K. M. (2007a). Reducing aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.13.1.11

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Waters, E. A., Weinstein, N. D., Colditz, G. A., & Emmons, K. M. (2007b). Aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 12(3), 383–401.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Ubel, P. A., Smith, D. M., Derry, H. A., McClure, J. B., Stark, A., Pitsch, R. K., & Fagerlin, A. (2008). Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs. Patient Education and Counseling, 73(2), 209–214.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    Disclaimer:

    This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.

    Click here for Source link (https://www.springeropen.com/)