• Costa JG, Costa GS, Costa C, de Vilella OV, Mattos CT, de Cury-Saramago AA. Clinical recognition of mouth breathers by orthodontists: a preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2017;152:646–53.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao Z, Zheng L, Huang X, Li C, Liu J, Hu Y. Effects of mouth breathing on facial skeletal development in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health BioMed Central. 2021;21:1–14.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Claudino LV, Mattos CT, Ruellas ACDO, Sant Anna EF. Pharyngeal airway characterization in adolescents related to facial skeletal pattern: a preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143:799–809.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moss ML. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 1. The role of mechanotransduction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:8–11.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bresolin D, Shapiro PA, Shapiro GG, Chapko MK, Dassel S. Mouth breathing in allergic children: Its relationship to dentofacial development. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:334–40.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harvold EP. Primate experiments respiration. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:71–6.


    Google Scholar
     

  • El H, Palomo JM. Airway volume for different dentofacial skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;139:e511-21.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brito FC, Brunetto DP, Nojima MCG. Three-dimensional study of the upper airway in different skeletal Class II malocclusion patterns. Angle Orthod. 2019;89:93–101.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chan L, Kaczynski R, Kang HK. A cross-sectional retrospective study of normal changes in the pharyngeal airway volume in white children with 3 different skeletal patterns from age 9 to 15 years: Part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2020;158:710–21.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ceylan I, Oktay H. A study on the pharyngeal size in different skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108:69–75.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De FMR, Penteado M, Alcazar V, Janson G, Maria K, De FS, et al. Upper and lower pharyngeal airways in subjects with Class I and Class II malocclusions and different growth patterns Marcos. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130:742–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gholinia F, Habibi L, Boyouki MA. Cephalometric evaluation of the upper airway in different skeletal classifications of jaws. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30:E469–74.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alves PVM, Zhao L, O’Gara M, Patel PK, Bolognese AM. Three-dimensional cephalometric study of upper airway space in skeletal class II and III healthy patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19:1497–507.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Isidor S, Di CG, Cornelis MA, Isidor F, Cattaneo PM. Three-dimensional evaluation of changes in upper airway volume in growing skeletal Class II patients following mandibular advancement treatment with functional orthopedic appliances. Angle Orthod. 2018;88:552–9.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harari D, Redlich M, Miri S, Hamud T, Gross M. The effect of mouth breathing versus nasal breathing on dentofacial and craniofacial development in orthodontic patient. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:2089–93.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Miranda-viana M, Freitas DQ. Classification and morphological analysis of the hard palate in cone-beam computed tomography scans: a retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;79:695.e1-695.e13.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lione R, Franchi L, Ghislanzoni LTH, Primozic J, Buongiorno M, Cozza P. Palatal surface and volume in mouth-breathing subjects evaluated with three-dimensional analysis of digital dental casts: a controlled study. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37:101–4.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lione R, Buongiorno M, Franchi L, Cozza P. Evaluation of maxillary arch dimensions and palatal morphology in mouth-breathing children by using digital dental casts. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78:91–5.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hwang S, Song J, Lee J, Choi YJ, Chung CJ, Kim KH. Three-dimensional evaluation of dentofacial transverse widths in adults with different sagittal facial patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2018;154:365–74.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maspero C, Abate A, Bellincioni F, Cavagnetto D, Lanteri V, Costa A, et al. Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults. Prog Orthod. 2019;20:40.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ning R, Guo J, Li Q, Martin D. Maxillary width and hard palate thickness in men and women with different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2021;159:564–73.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pandis N. Sample calculations for comparison of 2 means. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2012;141:519–21.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alves M, Baratieri C, Nojima LI, Nojima MCG, Ruellas ACO. Three-dimensional assessment of pharyngeal airway in nasal- and mouth-breathing children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75:1195–9.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang Y, Yan Y, Cao J, Xie B, Xiao X, Luo M, et al. Obeservations on association between third molar agenesis and craniofacial morphology. J Orofac Orthop. 2017;78:504–10.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mohamed AS, Habumugisha J, Cheng B, Zhao M, Guo Y, Zou R, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of hyoid bone position in nasal and mouth breathing subjects with skeletal Class I, and Class II. BMC Oral Health BioMed Central. 2022;22(1):1–12.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Alves M, Baratieri C, Mattos CT, Brunetto D, Fontes RDC, Santos JRL, et al. Is the airway volume being correctly analyzed? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2012;141:657–61.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Wine P, Haughey M, Pajtas B, Kaczynski R. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of changes in the naso-maxillary complex associated with two types of maxillary expanders. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:448–57.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications; 1940.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chung Leng Muñoz I, Beltri Orta P. Comparison of cephalometric patterns in mouth breathing and nose breathing children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78:1167–72.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oh KM, Kim MA, Youn JK, Cho HJ, Park YH. Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between nasopharyngeal airway shape and adenoid size in children. 2013;43:160–7.

  • Rasmus R, Jacobs R. Mouth breathing and malocclusion :quantitative technique for measurement of oral and nasal air-flow velocities. Angle Orthod. 1969;39:296–302.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tourné LPM. Growth of the pharynx and its physiologic implications. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1991;99:129–39.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alves M, Franzotti ES, Baratieri C, Nunes LKF, Nojima LI, Ruellas ACO. Evaluation of pharyngeal airway space amongst different skeletal patterns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:814–9.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nath M, Ahmed J, Ongole R, Denny C, Shenoy N. CBCT analysis of pharyngeal airway volume and comparison of airway volume among patients with skeletal Class I Class II, and Class III malocclusion. A retrospective study. Cranio®. 2019;1:1–12.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee SH, Choi JH, Shin C, Lee HM, Kwon SY, Lee SH. How does open-mouth breathing influence upper airway anatomy? Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1102–6.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Anandarajah S, Dudhia R, Sandham A, Sonnesen L. Risk factors for small pharyngeal airway dimensions in preorthodontic children: a three-dimensional study. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:138–46.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kecik D. Three-dimensional analyses of palatal morphology and its relation to upper airway area in obstructive sleep apnea. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:300–6.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Johal A, Hons BDS, Conaghan C, Hons BDS. Maxillary morphology in obstructive sleep apnea: a cephalometric and model study. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:648–56.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Taylor M, Hans MG, Strohl KP, Nelson SBB. Soft tissue growth of the oropharynx. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:393–400.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Aznar T, Galán AF, Marín I, Domínguez A. Dental arch diameters and relationships to oral habits. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:441–5.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Staley RN, Stuntz WR, Peterson LC. A comparison of arch widths in adults with normal occlusion and adults with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:163–9.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ghoneima A, Kula K. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for airway volume analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35:256–61.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • El H, Palomo JM. Three-dimensional evaluation of upper airway following rapid maxillary expansion A CBCT study. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:265–73.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Silva MAG, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;133:640.e1-640.e5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Franco LP, Souki BQ, Pereira TBJ, De Brito GM, Becker HMG, Pinto JA. Is the growth pattern in mouth breathers comparable with the counterclockwise mandibular rotation of nasal breathers? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;144:341–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

    Disclaimer:

    This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.

    Click here for Source link (https://www.biomedcentral.com/)