• Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DVM, Button KS, Chambers CD, Percie du Sert N, et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Human Behav. 2017;1(1):0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ioannidis JPA, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher D, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):166–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cashin AG, Bagg MK, Richards GC, Toomey E, McAuley JH, Lee H. Limited engagement with transparent and open science standards in the policies of pain journals: a cross-sectional evaluation. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020;26(6):313–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111296.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. 2016;533(7604):452–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goodman SN, Fanelli D, Ioannidis JPA. What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine. 2016; 8(341): 341ps12-ps12; doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027

  • Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015; 349(6251): aac4716; https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

  • Camerer CF, Dreber A, Holzmeister F, Ho T-H, Huber J, Johannesson M, et al. Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nat Hum Behav. 2018;2(9):637–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ES, et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(5):365–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prinz F, Schlange T, Asadullah K. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(9):712. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3439-c1.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bernards JR, Sato K, Haff GG, Bazyler CD. Current research and statistical practices in sport science and a need for change. Sports (Basel). 2017;5(4):87. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports5040087.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Halperin I, Vigotsky AD, Foster C, Pyne DB. Strengthening the practice of exercise and sport-science research. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(2):127–34. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2017-0322.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Caldwell AR, Vigotsky AD, Tenan MS, Radel R, Mellor DT, Kreutzer A, et al. Moving sport and exercise science forward: a call for the adoption of more transparent research practices. Sports Med. 2020;50(3):449–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01227-1.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DVM, Button KS, Chambers CD, Percie du Sert N, et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ioannidis JPA. How to Make More Published Research True. PLoS Med. 2014;11(10):e1001747. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moher D, Glasziou P, Chalmers I, Nasser M, Bossuyt PMM, Korevaar DA, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who’s listening? Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1573–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00307-4.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Primack RB, Regan TJ, Devictor V, Zipf L, Godet L, Loyola R, et al. Are scientific editors reliable gatekeepers of the publication process? Biol Cons. 2019;238:108232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108232.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, Schulz K, Altman DG, Hill C, et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust. 2006;185(5):263–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D. Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Syst Rev. 2012;1:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-60.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11):726–32. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Laine C, Horton R, DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Godlee F, et al. Clinical trial registration: looking back and moving ahead. JAMA. 2007;298(1):93–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.1.jed70037.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van de Wetering FT, Scholten RJ, Haring T, Clarke M, Hooft L. Trial registration numbers are underreported in biomedical publications. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(11):e49599. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049599.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler SJ, et al. SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture. Science. 2015;348(6242):1422–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Spitschan M, Schmidt MH, Blume C. Transparency and open science reporting guidelines in sleep research and chronobiology journals. bioRxiv. 2020: 2020.06.26.172940; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.26.172940

  • Mayo-Wilson E, Grant S, Supplee L, Kianersi S, Amin A, DeHaven A, et al. Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices. Res Integrity Peer Rev. 2021;6(1):1–11.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Lancaster GA. What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):67. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-67.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman CL, et al. Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomised controlled trials: development of a conceptual framework. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0150205. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150205.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hróbjartsson A, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(1):96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Centre for Open Science. TOP Factor Rubric. 2020.

  • Cashin AG, Bagg MK, Richards GC, Toomey E, McAuley JH, Lee H. Limited engagement with transparent and open science standards in the policies of pain journals: a cross-sectional evaluation. BMJ Evid-Based Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111296.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee H, Lamb SE, Bagg MK, Toomey E, Cashin AG, Moseley GL. Reproducible and replicable pain research: a critical review. Pain. 2018;159(9):1683–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001254.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: Conflict of Interest. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/conflicts-of-interest/.

  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Portney LG. Foundations of clinical research: applications to evidence-based practice. 2nd ed: FA Davis; 2020.

  • De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge University Press; 2011.

  • Arifin WN. A Web-based sample size calculator for reliability studies. Education in Medicine Journal. 2018;10(3):67–76.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Web of Science Major Journal List: Clarivate Analytics; Accessed 20 May, 2020. Available from: https://mjl.clarivate.com/.

  • R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.

  • Revelle WR. psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. 2017;

  • Wickham H. The tidyverse R package ver. 2017;1(1):836.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wickham H, Bryan J. readxl: Read excel files. R package version. 2019; 1(1);

  • Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis: springer; 2016.

  • Wilke CO. cowplot: streamlined plot theme and plot annotations for ‘ggplot2’. R package version 09. 2019; 4;

  • Nie NH, Bent DH, Hull CH. SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences: McGraw-Hill New York; 1975.

  • Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1033–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hansford HJ, Cashin AG, Wewege MA, Ferraro MC, McAuley JH, Jones MD. Evaluation of journal policies to increase promotion of transparency and openness in sport science research. J Sci Med Sport. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2021.08.004.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hansford HJ, Cashin AG, Wewege MA, Ferraro MC, McAuley JH, Jones MD. Evaluation of journal policies to increase promotion of transparency and openness in sport science research. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(11):3223–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.09.005.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hansford HJ, Cashin AG, Wewege MA, Ferraro MC, McAuley JH, Jones MD, et al. Open and transparent sports science research: the role of journals to move the field forward. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06893-9

  • Jones MD, Cashin, A. G., Wewege, M., Ferraro, M. C., McAuley, J., Bagg, M. K. . Feasibility of an audit and feedback intervention to facilitate journal policy change towards greater promotion of transparency and openness in sport science research. [Protocol]. In press 2021.

  • Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley; 2014.

  • Serghiou S, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Boyack KW, Riedel N, Wallach JD, Ioannidis JPA. Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open? PLoS Biol. 2021;19(3):e3001107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001107.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lash TL. Getting over TOP. Epidemiology. 2022;33(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000001424.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Centre for Open Science. Transparency and Opennes Promotion (TOP) Factor https://www.topfactor.org/: Centre for Open Science; 2021. Available from: https://www.topfactor.org/.

  • Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler SJ, et al. Promoting an open research culture. Science. 2015;348(6242):1422–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moynihan R, Macdonald H, Heneghan C, Bero L, Godlee F. Commercial interests, transparency, and independence: a call for submissions. British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2019.

  • Dal-Ré R, Caplan AL, Marusic A. Editors’ and authors’ individual conflicts of interest disclosure and journal transparency. A cross-sectional study of high-impact medical specialty journals. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(7): e029796; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029796

  • Gardener AD, Hicks EJ, Jacklin C, Tan G, Cashin AG, Lee H, et al. Open science policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeat cross-sectional study. medRxiv. 2022: 2022.01.26.22269868; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.26.22269868

  • Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    Disclaimer:

    This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.

    Click here for Source link (https://www.springeropen.com/)