The primary identification of tumor stemness biomarkers through bioinformatics analysis

In order to screen out an effective biomarker to construct the drug-resistant stem cell model, we preliminarily identified the stemness related genes in GC through the bioinformatics analysis.

The mRNAsi can reflect the tendency of tumor cell dedifferentiation and is a potential marker in CSCs identification. A remarkably higher mRNAsi was found in GC samples than in non-tumor samples (Fig. 3A). We used RNA-seq data from TCGA to identify 1572 DEGs (1225 upregulated and 347 downregulated) which can regulate the stemness of GC cells (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The mRNAsi and DEGs in GC and the WGCNA. A Differences in the expression of mRNAsi in GC samples compared to non-tumor samples. B Volcano plot demonstrated the differential expression in GC samples compared to non-tumor samples. C Co-expression module identification in GC. D Heatmap showed the association and significant differences between the gene modules and mRNAsi scores/EREG-mRNAsi. The correlation coefficient was shown in the upper row in each module, and the P value was shown in the bracket. Scatter plot of module eigengenes in the brown (E), red (F) and turquoise (G) module

To identify the gene modules with biological significance and search for genes strongly linked to GC stemness, we constructed a gene co-expression network by the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). 18 modules were constructed (Fig. 3C). The red, turquoise and brown modules were strongly correlated with the stemness of GC according to the MS and R2 (Fig. 3D). The brown module was positively correlated with mRNAsi (R2 = 0.77, P = 8e−15) (Fig. 3E), while the red and turquoise modules exhibited a negative correlation with mRNAsi (R2 =  − 0.77, P = 4e−15; R2 =  − 0.87, P < 2e−22) (Fig. 3F, 3G). Therefore, the brown module was further analyzed to search for the key stemness genes of GC. Finally, 16 important stemness genes (MSH6, SUPT16H, RBBP5, ANAPC1, NUP93, PRKDC, EFTUD2, HEATR1, TDP1, URB2, CEP85, CD44, OCT4, RFWD3, SOX2 and NANOG) were identified with the thresholds of MM > 0.8 and GS > 0.5. The heatmap (Fig. 4A) and boxplot (Fig. 4B) were drawn to demonstrate the expression of these genes in GC samples and CD44 was remarkably upregulated.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The expression difference of the key genes in GC. A The heatmap of the key genes in GC samples and non-tumor samples. B The boxplot of the key genes in GC samples and non-tumor samples. A, B CD44 exhibited a higher expression in GC samples compared to no-tumor samples

Based on the above analysis, we searched relevant literature and found that CD44, as a classic tumor stemness related gene and a common marker on the tumor cell surface, was considered to be a reliable GC stem cell sorting phenotype [19, 20]. Other studies have shown that CD44 was intimately related to drug resistance in tumors [21, 22]. Therefore, we selected CD44 as a biomarker to establish a drug-resistant stem cell model of gastric cancer for further research.

The construction and verification of GC drug-resistant stem cell model BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs

CD44( +)BGC823/5-Fu cells were isolated using the MACS method, seeded in ultralow adhesion six-well plates, and routinely cultured in serum-free medium (SFM). Morphological observation showed that CD44( +)BGC823/5-Fu cells tended to grow in suspension and aggregate into grape clusters. After 5 days, the cells aggregated into spheroids. After 7 days, the cell spheroid size increased rapidly, and the cells were tightly bound to each other. While CD44(-)BGC823/5-Fu cells were hard to aggregate into spherical growth (Fig. 5A). The cell smears of CD44(+)BGC823/5-Fu and CD44(-)BGC823/5-Fu were incubated with FITC-CD44 antibody (1:1000) for 30 min. And the fluorescence microscopy observation showed that CD44( +)BGC823/5-Fu cells demonstrated high expression of green fluorescence, which indicated that the cells can maintain the CD44( +) phenotypic characteristics during the differentiation process (Fig. 5B). In addition, the cell growth curve exhibited that the proliferation ability of CD44( +)BGC823/5-Fu cells was significantly stronger than that of CD44(-)BGC823/5-Fu cells (P < 0.01 since the day 4) (Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The separation and verification of CD44(+)BGC823/5-Fu stem cells. The growth status (A), fluorescence staining observation (B), cell growth curve (C), cell cycle (D) and colony formation analysis (E) of CD44(+)BGC823/5-Fu and CD44(-)BGC823/5-Fu cells. (F) The expression of stemness-related genes in CD44(+)BGC823/5-Fu and CD44(−)BGC823/5-Fu cells. (G) The tumor volume and weight of CD44(+)BGC823/5-Fu and CD44(-)BGC823/5-Fu-inoculated nude mice

Flow cytometry was applied to detect the cell cycle of CD44( +)BGC823/5-Fu and CD44(-)BGC823/5-Fu cells. The cell proliferation index [PI = (S + G2/M)/(G0/G1 + S + G2/M)*100%] of the two cell lines was 57.19 ± 1.37% and 40.98 ± 1.31%, respectively (P < 0.01), also indicating that CD44( +)BGC823/5-Fu gained stronger proliferative capacity than CD44(-)BGC823/5-Fu (Fig. 5D). The soft agar assay showed that CD44( +)BGC823/5-Fu formed more colonies and shaped larger colony diameters. The colony formation rate was 3.40 ± 0.43, which was higher than 2.27 ± 0.50 of CD44(-)BGC823/5-Fu (P < 0.01) (Fig. 5E). In addition, we analyzed the differences in stemness related gene expression in the two cell lines. The expression of NANOG, OCT4 and SOX2 in CD44( +)BGC823/5-Fu cells was significantly higher than that in CD44(-)BGC823/5-Fu cells (P < 0.01) (Fig. 5F). Besides, a tumor formation experiment in nude mice revealed that the tumor volume (P < 0.05) and weight (P < 0.01) of CD44( +)BGC823/5-Fu inoculated mice were conspicuously larger than those of CD44(-)BGC823/5-Fu inoculated mice (Fig. 5G).

Based on the above experiments, we successfully constructed a CD44( +) gastric cancer stem cell model and confirmed the stemness characteristics from multiple dimensions, revealing that CD44(+)BGC823/5-Fu was a reliable GC stem cell model (we named it “BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs”).

BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs exhibited strong drug resistance to 5-Fu and high expression of ABC transporter genes

To explore the drug resistance degree of cells with different CD44 expression status, the CCK8 assay was used to detect the sensitivity of BGC823, CD44(-)BGC823/5-Fu and CD44( +)BGC823/5-Fu to 5-Fu, and the drug resistance index of CD44(-) cells and CD44( +) cells were 5.93 and 15.60, respectively (Fig. 6A). It suggested that BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs cells (marked with CD44 positive) presented stronger drug resistance to 5-Fu. Since the existence of ABC transporters is one of the classic mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance. It acts as a “transport pump” to pump chemotherapy drugs out of the cells. We detected the expression of MDR1 and MRP1 (two important ABC transporter genes) in BGC823, CD44(−)BGC823/5-Fu and CD44(+)BGC823/5-Fu cells. It demonstrated that CD44(+) cells showed higher expression levels of MDR1 and MRP1 no matter compared with BGC823 cells or CD44(-) cells (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6B). These results revealed that BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs cells had stronger drug resistant ability than CD44(−) cells and they gained resistance to 5-Fu through over-expression of multiple drug-resistant genes in the ABC transporter pathway.

Fig. 6
figure 6

The sensitivity of CD44(−) and CD44(+)(CSCs) cells to 5-Fu and the gene expression and prognostic value of ABC transporters. A The inhibition rate of BGC823, CD44(-)BGC823/5-Fu and CD44(+)BGC823/5-Fu (BGC823/5-Fu-CSCs) treated with 5-Fu after 48 h. B The gene expression of MDR1 and MRP1 in the three cell lines detected by Q-PCR. C The Kaplan–Meier curve related to OS of MDR1 and MRP1 in GC patients

To analyze the relationship between the drug resistance genes and the clinical outcome in GC patients, the prognostic values of MDR1 and MRP1 were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier Plotter. A total of 875 GC patients were available for the analysis of overall survival (OS). The relatively higher expressions of MDR1 (HR: 1.4 [1.17–1.68], log-rank P = 0.0017) and MRP1 (HR: 1.35 [1.14–1.6], log-rank P = 5e–04) were associated with an unfavorable prognostic outcome in GC patients (Fig. 6C). It indicated that inhibiting the expression of MDR1 and MRP1 was a potential approach to improve the GC prognosis.

YQHY efficiently inhibited the drug resistance of BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs

To explore the inhibitory effect of YQHY on the drug resistance of CD44(−)BGC823/5-Fu and CD44(+)BGC823/5-Fu, the CCK-8 assay was applied to detect the inhibition rate of the cells after intervention with YQHY combined with 5-Fu (or YQHY alone). As shown in Fig. 7A, B, YQHY alone or YQHY + 5-Fu can both inhibit the growth of CD44(−) and CD44( +) cells. And YQHY combined with 5-Fu had a stronger inhibitory effect. Interestingly, there was no difference in the growth inhibition effect of YQHY alone on the two cells, but when YQHY was administered in combination with 5-Fu, YQHY + 5-Fu had a stronger toxic effect on CD44( +) cells than on CD44(−) cells. This indicated that YQHY had a better drug resistance inhibitory effect on CD44( +) cells than on CD44(-) cells. In addition, under the same intervention of 45ug/ml 5-Fu (the IC50 of 5-Fu to BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs), the inhibition rate of cell proliferation raised gradually with the increase concentration of YQHY (Fig. 7C).

Fig. 7
figure 7

The effect of YQHY on the drug resistance of CD44(-) and CD44(+) (CSCs) cells. A The inhibition rate of CD44(−)BGC823/5-Fu and CD44(+)BGC823/5-Fu treated with YQHY. B The inhibition rate of CD44(-)BGC823/5-Fu and CD44(+)BGC823/5-Fu treated with YQHY + 5-Fu. C The comparison of the inhibition rate of BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs intervened with YQHY or YQHY + 5-Fu. D The apoptosis rate of BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs treated with different concentrations of YQHY or combined with 5-Fu. AD The duration of administration was 48 h. BD The concentration of 5-Fu used in CD44(−)BGC823/5-Fu and CD44(+)BGC823/5-Fu was 20 μg/ml and 45 μg/ml, respectively (the IC50 to 5-Fu of each cell line). * represented the comparison between YQHY and Control group; # represented the comparison between YQHY + 5-Fu and 5-Fu group. represented the comparison between YQHY and YQHY + 5-Fu group

Since apoptosis is an important way in which 5-Fu induces the cell death, we further verified the above results from the perspective of the cell apoptosis. We selected 4%, 8% and 12% as the low, medium and high concentration of YQHY for the further researches. Flow cytometry was used to detect the apoptosis of BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs. With the increase of YQHY concentration, the apoptosis rate of BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs increased gradually. And when intervened with the same concentration of YQHY, the pro-apoptotic ability of YQHY combined with 5-Fu was significantly better than that of YQHY alone (P < 0.05) (Fig. 7D). These results demonstrated that YQHY can efficiently reverse the drug resistance of BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs to 5-Fu.

YQHY suppressed the expression of ABC transporter genes

Based on the above experiments, we have found that BGC823/5-Fu-CSCs were characterized with the high expression of MDR1 and MRP1 and YQHY effectively reversed the drug resistance of BGC823/5-Fu-CSCs cells. We envisioned whether YQHY can suppress the ABC transporter pathway to inhibit the drug resistance of BGC823/5-Fu-CSCs. We detected the effects of YQHY on the expression of MDR1 and MRP1 in BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs. Q-PCR demonstrated that the mRNA expression levels of MDR1 and MRP1 were obviously reduced in a YQHY concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 8A). Western blot also showed that the protein expression levels of P-gp (encoded by the MDR1 gene) and MRP1 were decreased (Fig. 8B). These results confirmed that YQHY can restrain the expression of ABC transporter genes which were associated with the drug resistance of BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs.

Fig. 8
figure 8

The effect of YQHY on the expression of MDR1 and MRP1. The gene (A) and protein (B) expression of MDR1 and MRP1 after incubation with YQHY for 48 h

YQHY restrained the activation of PI3K/Akt/Nrf signaling pathway in BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs

We explored the relevant molecular mechanism of YQHY in the inhibition of BGC823/5–Fu-CSC drug resistance. In our previous studies, we used mass spectrometry to analyze the chemical substances of Yi-qi-hua-yu-jie-du decoction and identified the core targets of this formula in GC treatment. KEGG enrichment analysis was performed on the targets of Yi-qi-hua-yu-jie-du decoction in GC treatment. The PI3K/Akt pathway was an important one in the enrichment analysis (Fig. 9A). Current studies have reported that Nrf2 can be a downstream factor of PI3K/AKT and is closely related to the expression of MDR1 and MRP1 [23, 24], so we explored the influence of YQHY on the PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 signaling pathway.

Fig. 9
figure 9

The inhibitory effect of YQHY on the activation of the PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 pathway. A KEGG analysis of Yi-qi-hua-yu-jie-du decoction for GC treatment. B The expression of PI3K, p-PI3K, AKT, p-AKT and Nrf2 proteins after YQHY intervention for 48 h. C Immunofluorescence staining images of Nrf2 after YQHY (the high concentration) intervention for 48 h

After YQHY intervention on BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs for 48 h, the changes in PI3K, p-PI3K, AKT, p-AKT and Nrf2 were detected by Western blot. It was found that p-PI3K/PI3K, p-AKT/AKT and Nrf2 expression decreased in a YQHY concentration dependent manner, indicating that YQHY can suppress the phosphorylation of the PI3K/AKT pathway and inhibit the expression of Nrf2 (Fig. 9B). The localization of Nrf2 was essential to its biological function, so we further tested the distribution of Nrf2 in cells by immunofluorescence staining. The results demonstrated that YQHY (the high concentration) reduced the fluorescence intensity of Nrf2 in the nucleus and it can restrain the entry of Nrf2 into the nucleus. (Fig. 9C).

YQHY inhibited the drug resistance of BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs via PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 signaling pathway

To further prove that YQHY suppressed the expression of MDR1 and MRP1 via PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 pathway, thereby reversing the drug resistance of BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs, we intervened BGC823/5–Fu-CSC cells with YQHY (high concentration) and IGF-1(the activator of PI3K/Akt pathway), and observed the changes in PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 pathway, the gene expressions of MDR1 and MRP1, and the drug resistance status of BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs. The results showed that IGF-1 alleviated the inhibitory effect of YQHY on PI3K/AKT/Nrf2 signaling pathway (Fig. 10A, 10B). Meanwhile, it can partially restore the expression levels of MDR1 and MRP1 (Fig. 10C), which confirming that the suppressive effect of YQHY on MDR1 and MRP1 was regulated by the PI3K/AKT/Nrf2 pathway. We further explored the role of PI3K/AKT/Nrf2 pathway in the regulation of YQHY on BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs drug resistance. As shown in Fig. 10D, IGF-1 partially blocked the proliferation-inhibitory effect of YQHY on BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs. Similarly, the promoting apoptosis effect of YQHY was significantly reduced (Fig. 10E, 10F).

Fig. 10
figure 10

The validation of the mechanism of YQHY on the BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs drug resistance using IGF-1. A, B The expression of PI3K, p-PI3K, AKT, p-AKT and Nrf2 proteins after YQHY/YQHY + IGF-1 intervention. C The mRNA expression of MDR1 and MRP1. D The cell viability rates of BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs. E, F The apoptosis rates of BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs. AE The duration of administration was 48 h

In addition, we applied siRNA assay to gain a Nrf2-knockdown BGC823/5-Fu-CSCs cell line (Fig. 11A, si-Nrf2-3). It was found that si-Nrf2 can reduce the expression of P-gp and MRP1, while the combination of YQHY and si-Nrf2 had a stronger inhibitory effect on these drug resistant proteins (Fig. 11B). Similarly, si-Nrf2 + 5-Fu can produce high cytotoxicity to BGC823/5-Fu-CSCs, and YQHY + siNrf2 + 5-Fu presented the most significant inhibition on the cell viability (Fig. 11C). This indicated that Nrf2 was a vital target in the drug resistance of BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs. YQHY and si-Nrf2 synergistically increased the suppressive effect of the drug resistance in BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs.

Fig. 11
figure 11

The expression of MDR1 and MRP1 and the sensitivity to 5-Fu in BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs when knockdown of Nrf2. A The expression of Nrf2 after intervened with Nrf2 siRNA. The si-Nrf2-3 gained the most Nrf2 knockdown efficiency and it was used in the subsequent experiments. B The expression of P-gp (encoded by MDR1) and MRP1. C The cell viability of BGC823/5–Fu-CSCs. B, C The duration of administration was 48 h

These results verified that YQHY inhibited the MDR1 and MRP1 expression via PI3K/Akt/Nrf2, thus reversing the drug resistance of BGC823/5–Fu–CSCs.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Disclaimer:

This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.

Click here for Source link (https://www.biomedcentral.com/)