• Afzal, H., Ali, I., Khan, M. A., & Hamid, K. (2010). A study of university students’ motivation and its relationship with their academic performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(4), 80–89.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5(1), 307–337.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bandura, A. (2010). Self‐efficacy. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 1–3.

  • Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? Inroads, 2(1), 48–54.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bostrom, R. P., Olfman, L., & Sein, M. K. (1990). The importance of learning style in end-user training. MIS Quarterly, 14, 101–119.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cai, Z., Guan, Y., Li, H., Shi, W., Guo, K., Liu, Y., Li, Q., Han, X., Jiang, P., Fang, Z., & Hua, H. (2015). Self-esteem and proactive personality as predictors of future work self and career adaptability: An examination of mediating and moderating processes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 86–94.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, G., Shen, J., Barth-Cohen, L., Jiang, S., Huang, X., & Eltoukhy, M. (2017a). Assessing elementary students’ computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming. Computers & Education, 109, 162–175.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, H., Sun, H., & Dai, J. (2017b). Peer support and adolescents’ physical activity: The mediating roles of self-efficacy and enjoyment. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 42(5), 569–577.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chin, W. W., & Gopal, A. (1995). Adoption intention in GSS: Relative importance of beliefs. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 26(2–3), 42–64.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cho, M. H., Kim, Y., & Choi, D. (2017). The effect of self-regulated learning on college students’ perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 10–17.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chong, S., Pan, G. T., Chin, J., Show, P. L., Yang, T. C. K., & Huang, C. M. (2018). Integration of 3D printing and industry 4.0 into engineering teaching. Sustainability, 10(11), 3960.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers & Education, 122, 273–290.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Czerkawski, B. C., & Lyman, E. W. (2015). Exploring issues about computational thinking in higher education. TechTrends, 59(2), 57–65.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Durak, H. Y., & Saritepeci, M. (2018). Analysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation model. Computers & Education, 116, 191–202.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. Achievement and Achievement Motives.

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage Publications.

    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Flum, H., & Kaplan, A. (2006). Exploratory orientation as an educational goal. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 99–110.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goh, T. T., & Yang, B. (2021). The role of e-engagement and flow on the continuance with a learning management system in a blended learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–23.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gomez, E. A., Wu, D., & Passerini, K. (2010). Computer-supported team-based learning: The impact of motivation, enjoyment and team contributions on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 55(1), 378–390.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gong, D., Yang, H. H., & Cai, J. (2020). Exploring the key influencing factors on college students’ computational thinking skills through flipped-classroom instruction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1–13.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Güven, I., & Gulbahar, Y. (2020). Integrating computational thinking into social studies. The Social Studies, 111(5), 234–248.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017a). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017b). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE.

    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hsu, T. C., Chang, S. C., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296–310.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hu, P. J. H., & Hui, W. (2012). Examining the role of learning engagement in technology-mediated learning and its effects on learning effectiveness and satisfaction. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 782–792.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Israel, M., Pearson, J. N., Tapia, T., Wherfel, Q. M., & Reese, G. (2015). Supporting all learners in school-wide computational thinking: A cross-case qualitative analysis. Computers & Education, 82, 263–279.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • ISTE, C. (2022). Computational thinking in K-12 education leadership toolkits. Retrieved January 24, 2022, from https://www.iste.org/standards/computational-thinking?_ga=2.183977958.1744591423.1564987683-1256986531.1564987683

  • Kaplan, H., & Madjar, N. (2017). The motivational outcomes of psychological need support among pre-service teachers: Multicultural and self-determination theory perspectives. Frontiers in Education, 2, 1–14.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Karadag, E., Su, A., & Ergin-Kocaturk, H. (2021). Multi-level analyses of distance education capacity, faculty members’ adaptation, and indicators of student satisfaction in higher education during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–20.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ke, F., & Kwak, D. (2013). Online learning across ethnicity and age: A study on learning interaction participation, perception, and learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 61, 43–51.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, H. J., & Jang, H. Y. (2015). Factors influencing students’ beliefs about the future in the context of tablet-based interactive classrooms. Computers & Education, 89, 1–15.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.

    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kong, S. C., Chiu, M. M., & Lai, M. (2018). A study of primary school students’ interest, collaboration attitude, and programming empowerment in computational thinking education. Computers & Education, 127, 178–189.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kules, B. (2016). Computational thinking is critical thinking: Connecting to university discourse, goals, and learning outcomes. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, J., & Jung, I. (2021). Instructional changes instigated by university faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic: The effect of individual, course and institutional factors. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–19.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lu, K., Yang, H. H., Shi, Y., & Wang, X. (2021). Examining the key influencing factors on college students’ higher-order thinking skills in the smart classroom environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–13.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meyer, O. A., Omdahl, M. K., & Makransky, G. (2019). Investigating the effect of pre-training when learning through immersive virtual reality and video: A media and methods experiment. Computers & Education, 140, 103603.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Molinillo, S., Anaya-Sánchez, R., Aguilar-Illescas, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018). Social media-based collaborative learning: Exploring antecedents of attitude. Internet and Higher Education, 38(1), 18–27.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moorthy, K., T’ing, L. C., Wei, K. M., Mei, P. T. Z., Yee, C. Y., Wern, K. L. J., & Xin, Y. M. (2019). Is facebook useful for learning? A study in private universities in Malaysia. Computers & Education, 130, 94–104.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mun, Y. Y., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: Self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 431–449.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nägele, C., & Stalder, B. E. (2017). Competence-based vocational and professional education. Springer.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Raedeke, T. D. (2007). The relationship between enjoyment and affective responses to exercise. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19(1), 105–115.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Romero, M., Lepage, A., & Lille, B. (2017). Computational thinking development through creative programming in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–15.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. Handbook of Market Research, 26(1), 1–40.

    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shapiro, A. M., Sims-Knight, J., O’Rielly, G. V., Capaldo, P., Pedlow, T., Gordon, L., & Monteiro, K. (2017). Clickers can promote fact retention but impede conceptual understanding: The effect of the interaction between clicker use and pedagogy on learning. Computers & Education, 111, 44.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tekdal, M. (2021). Trends and development in research on computational thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6499–6529.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2011). An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1645–1653.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tikva, C., & Tambouris, E. (2021). Mapping computational thinking through programming in K-12 education: A conceptual model based on a systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 162, 104083.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vayre, E., & Vonthron, A. M. (2019). Relational and psychological factors affecting exam participation and student achievement in online college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 43, 100671.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wei, X., Lin, L., Meng, N., Tan, W., & Kong, S. C. (2020). The effectiveness of partial pair programming on elementary school students’ computational thinking skills and self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 160, 104023.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725.

    MathSciNet 
    MATH 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yılmaz, F. G. K., Yılmaz, R., & Durak, H. Y. (2018). Teaching computational thinking in primary education. IGI Global.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zysberg, L., & Schwabsky, N. (2021). School climate, academic self-efficacy and student achievement. Educational Psychology, 41(4), 467–482.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    Disclaimer:

    This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.

    Click here for Source link (https://www.springeropen.com/)

    Loading