• World Cancer Research Fund. Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Colorectal Cancer. London: WCRF; 2017.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 2019; 393(10170):447–92.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wyness L. The role of red meat in the diet: nutrition and health benefits. Proc Nutr Soc. 2016; 75(3):227–32.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • British Meat Processors Association. The UK meat sector and labour: Putting British food on your plate. London: British Meat Processors Association; 2018.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Brambila-Macias J, Shankar B, Capacci S, Mazzocchi M, Perez-Cueto FJA, Verbeke W, Traill WB. Policy interventions to promote healthy eating: a review of what works, what does not, and what is promising. Food Nutr Bull. 2011; 32(4):365–75.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rose GA, Khaw K, Marmot M. Rose’s Strategy of Preventive Medicine: the Complete Original Text. USA: Oxford University Press; 2008.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Department of Health and Social Care. New advertising rules to help tackle childhood obesity. 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-advertising-rules-to-help-tackle-childhood-obesity. Accessed 01 July 2021.

  • Angus C, Holmes J, Pryce R, Meier P, Brennan A. Model-based appraisal of the comparative impact of Minimum Unit Pricing and taxation policies in Scotland – An adaptation of the Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model version 3: University of Sheffield; 2016.

  • Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency. Rates of vehicle tax for cars, motorcycles, light goods vehicles and private light goods vehicles V149. Swansea: Driver and vehicle licensing agency (DVLA); 2019.


    Google Scholar
     

  • World Cancer Research Fund. Meat, Fish and Dairy Products and the Risk of Cancer. London: WCRF; 2018.


    Google Scholar
     

  • World Cancer Research Fund. Recommendations and Public Health and Policy Implications. London: WCRF; 2018.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6):394–424.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Santarelli RL, Pierre F, Corpet DE. Processed meat and colorectal cancer: a review of epidemiologic and experimental evidence. Nutr Cancer. 2008; 60(2):131–44.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bouvard V, Loomis D, Guyton KZ, Grosse Y, El Ghissassi F, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Guha N, Mattock H, Straif K, Corpet D. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(16):1599–600.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition. Iron and Health. Norwich: TSO; 2010.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Allen LH. Anemia and iron deficiency: effects on pregnancy outcome. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000; 71(5):1280–4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Otto MC, Alvaro A, Duk-Hee L, Delclos GL, Bertoni AG, Jiang R, Lima JA, Symanski E, Jacobs DR, A.N. J. Dietary intakes of zinc and heme iron from red meat, but not from other sources, are associated with greater risk of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. J Nutr. 2012; 142(3):526–33.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein AM, Schulze MB, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB. Red meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: 3 cohorts of us adults and an updated meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011; 94(4):1088–96.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin F, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK. Global consequences of land use. Science. 2005; 309(5734):570–4.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schwarzenbach RP, Egli T, Hofstetter TB, Von Gunten U, Wehrli B. Global water pollution and human health. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2010; 35:109–36.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lares-Michel M, Housni FE, Cervantes V, Gabriela A. A quantitative estimation of the water footprint of the Mexican diet, corrected for washing and cooking water. Food Secur. 2021; 13:1–26.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • National Farmers Union. Achieving Net Zero: Farming’s 2040 Goal. Kenilworth: NFU; 2019.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Reisinger A, Clark H. How much do direct livestock emissions actually contribute to global warming?Glob Chang Biol. 2018; 24(4):1749–61.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiaoming X, Sharma P, Shu S, Tzu-Shun L, Ciais P, Tubiello FN, Smith P, Campbell N, Jain AK. Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nat Food. 2021; 2(9):724–32.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bilandžić N, Sedak M, Ðokić M, Varenina I, Kolanović BS, Božić DJ, Brstilo M, Šimić B. Determination of zinc concentrations in foods of animal origin, fish and shellfish from croatia and assessment of their contribution to dietary intake. J Food Compos Anal. 2014; 35(2):61–6.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G. Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock: a Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); 2013.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ripple WJ, Smith P, Haberl H, Montzka SA, McAlpine C, Boucher DH. Ruminants, climate change and climate policy. Nat Clim Chang. 2014; 4(1):2–5.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre. National Diet and Nutrition Survey Years 1-9, 2008-2017.UK Data Service; 2020. https://ukdataservice.ac.uk. Accessed 22 Mar 2021.

  • Public Health England. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Results from Years 1, 2, 3 and 4 (combined) of the Rolling Programme (2008/2009 – 2011/2012). London: Public Health England; 2014.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Derbyshire E. Micronutrient intakes of british adults across mid-life: A secondary analysis of the UK national diet and nutrition survey. Front Nutr. 2018; 5:55.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hallström E, Börjesson P. Meat-consumption statistics: reliability and discrepancy. Sustain Sci Pract Policy. 2013; 9(2):37–47.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Fitt E, Mak TN, Stephen AM, Prynne C, Roberts C, Swan G, Farron-Wilson M. Disaggregating composite food codes in the UK national diet and nutrition survey food composition databank. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010; 64(3):32–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McCance RA, Widdowson EM. McCance and Widdowson’s the Composition of Foods: Edition 6. London: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2002.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Fraser GE, Welch A, Luben R, Bingham SA, Day NE. The effect of age, sex, and education on food consumption of a middle-aged english cohort—EPIC in east anglia. Prev Med. 2000; 30(1):26–34.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • James WHM, Lomax N, Birkin M, Collins LM. Geodemographic patterns of meat expenditure in Great Britain. Appl Spat Anal Policy. 2021; 14:563–590.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chan DSM, Lau R, Aune D, Vieira R, Greenwood DC, Kampman E, Norat T. Red and processed meat and colorectal cancer incidence: meta-analysis of prospective studies. PloS ONE. 2011; 6(6):20456.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Office for National Statistics. The National Statistics Socio-economic classification (NS-SEC). 2022. https://www.ons.gov.uk/. Accessed 13 Apr 2022.

  • National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre. National Diet and Nutrition Survey – Assessment of salt intake from urinary sodium in adults (aged 19 to 64 years) in England, 2018 to 2019.UK Data Service; 2020. https://ukdataservice.ac.uk. Accessed 24 Mar 2021.

  • Department of Health and Social Care. Dietary Reference Values for Food Energy and Nutrients for the United Kingdom. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO); 1991.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hooper L, Summerbell CD, Higgins JPT, Thompson RL, Capps NE, Smith GD, Riemersma RA, Ebrahim S. Dietary fat intake and prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review. Bmj. 2001; 322(7289):757–63.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lichtenstein AH, Kennedy E, Barrier P, Danford D. Dietary fat consumption and health/discussion. Nutr Rev. 1998; 56(5):3.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition. Saturated Fats and Health: SACN Report. Vissenbjerg: SACN; 2019.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Pot GK, Prynne CJ, Roberts C, Olson A, Nicholson SK, Whitton C, Teucher B, Bates B, Henderson H, Pigott S. National diet and nutrition survey: fat and fatty acid intake from the first year of the rolling programme and comparison with previous surveys. Br J Nutr. 2012; 107(3):405–15.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Office for National Statistics. Mid-year population estimates. 2021. https://nomisweb.co.uk. Accessed 22 Mar 2021.

  • James WHM, Lomax N, Birkin M. Local level estimates of food, drink and tobacco expenditure for Great Britain. Sci Data. 2019; 6(1):1–14.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc. Washington: National Academy of Medicine; 2001.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Office for National Statistics. National population projections: 2018-based. 2021. http://ons.gov.uk. Accessed 5 Apr 2022.

  • Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. The UK Cattle Yearbook 2019. Kenilworth: AHDB; 2019.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. The UK Sheep Yearbook 2019. Kenilworth: AHDB; 2019.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. UK Pig Facts and Figures – 2019. Kenilworth: AHDB; 2019.


    Google Scholar
     

  • OECD. Meat consumption (indicator). 2021. https://doi.org/10.1787/fa290fd0-en.

  • Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change. Climate change: The IPCC scientific assessment.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Clune S, Crossin E, Verghese K. Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories. J Clean Prod. 2017; 140:766–83.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. Beef trade. 2020. https://ahdb.org.uk/beef/beef-trade. Accessed 08 Mar 2021.

  • Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. Pig meat trade. 2020. https://ahdb.org.uk/pork/pig-meat-trade. Accessed 08 Mar 2021.

  • Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. Sheep meat trade. 2020. https://ahdb.org.uk/lamb/sheep-meat-trade. Accessed 08 Mar 2021.

  • Saunders CM, Barber A. Carbon footprints, life cycle analysis, food miles: global trade trends and market issues. Polit Sci. 2008; 60(1):73–88.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saunders CM, Barber A, Taylor GJ. Food Miles-comparative Energy/emissions Performance of New Zealand’s Agriculture Industry. Lincoln: Lincoln University Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit.; 2006.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Brand JE. The far-reaching impact of job loss and unemployment. Annu Rev Sociol. 2015; 41:359–75.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dorling D. Unemployment and health. BMJ. 2009; 338:b829.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Aragón FM, Rud JP, Toews G. Resource shocks, employment, and gender: evidence from the collapse of the UK coal industry. Labour Econ. 2018; 52:54–67.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beatty C, Fothergill S, Powell R. Twenty years on: has the economy of the UK coalfields recovered?Environ Plan A. 2007; 39(7):1654–75.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Weber CL, Matthews HS. Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 42(10):3508–3513.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • National Farmers Union. Farm Animal Welfare Global Review Summary Report. Kenilworth: NFU; 2018.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ashwell M, Barlow S, Gibson S, Harris C. National diet and nutrition surveys: the british experience. Public Health Nutr. 2006; 9(4):523–30.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Whybrow S, Horgan G, Macdiarmid W, Jennie I. Self-reported food intake decreases over recording period in the national diet and nutrition survey. Br J Nutr. 2020; 124(6):586–90.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rennie KL, Coward A, Jebb SA. Estimating under-reporting of energy intake in dietary surveys using an individualised method. Br J Nutr. 2007; 97(6):1169–76.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barrie A, Coward WA. A rapid analytical technique for the determination of energy expenditure by the doubly labelled water method. Biomed Mass Spectrom. 1985; 12:535–41.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goldberg GR, Black AE, Jebb SA, Cole TJ, Murgatroyd PR, Coward WA, Prentice AM. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991; 45(12):569–81.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Black AE. Critical evaluation of energy intake using the goldberg cut-off for energy intake: basal metabolic rate. a practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int J Obes. 2000; 24(9):1119–1130.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre. Appendix X Misreporting in the National Diet and Nutrition Survey Rolling Programme (NDNS RP): summary of results and their interpretation: UK Data Service; 2017. https://food.gov.uk. Accessed 13 Apr 2022.

  • Swan G. Findings from the latest national diet and nutrition survey. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004; 63(4):505–12.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Birkin M, James WHM, Lomax N, Smith A. Data linkage and its applications for planning support systems In: Geertman S, Stillwell J, editors. Handbook of Planning Support Science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing: 2020.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Khushi S, Ahmad SR, Ashraf A, Imran M. Spatially analyzing food consumption inequalities using GIS with disaggregated data from punjab, pakistan. Food Secur. 2020; 12(6):1283–98.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • James WHM, Tejedor-Garavito N, Hanspal SE, Campbell-Sutton A, Hornby GM, Pezzulo C, Nilsen K, Sorichetta A, Ruktanonchai CW, Carioli A, Kerr D, Matthews Z, Tatem A. Gridded birth and pregnancy datasets for africa, latin america and the caribbean. Sci Data. 2018; 5(1):1–11.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pezzulo C, Nilsen K, Carioli A, Tejedor-Garavito N, Hanspal SE, Hilber T, James WHM, Ruktanonchai CW, Alegana V, Sorichetta A, Wigley AS, Hornby GM, Matthews Z, Tatem A. Geographical distribution of fertility rates in 70 low-income, lower-middle-income, and upper-middle-income countries, 2010-16: a subnational analysis of cross-sectional surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2021; 9(6):802–12.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gill M, Feliciano D, Macdiarmid J, Smith P. The environmental impact of nutrition transition in three case study countries. Food Secur. 2015; 7(3):493–504.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • National Farmers Union. The Future of Food 2040. Kenilworth: NFU; 2019.


    Google Scholar
     

  • National Sheep Association. A Vision for British lamb production: Warwickshire; 2014.

  • Food and Agriculture Organization. Animal Production and Health Division: Meat and Meat Products. 2021. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/themes/en/meat/home.html. Accessed 05 Mar 2021.

  • Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

    Disclaimer:

    This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.

    Click here for Source link (https://www.biomedcentral.com/)