• Amini M, Mirtaheri M, Zandi AP (2017) Improving seismic performance of segmental precast post-tensioned bridge piers. Proc I Civil Eng-str B 170(12):928–938

  • Baker T, Saiidi MS, Nakashoji B, Bingle J, Moore T, Khaleghi B (2018) Precast concrete spliced-girder bridge in Washington State using superelastic materials in bridge columns to improve seismic resiliency: from research to practice. PCI J 63(1):57–71

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Billington SL, Barnes RW, Breen JE (1998) A Precast Substructure Design for Standard Bridge Systems. FHW AffX-98/1410-2F. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin

  • Billington SL, Yoon J (2004) Cyclic response of unbonded posttensioned precast columns with ductile fiber-reinforced concrete. J Bridg Eng 9:353–363

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bu ZY, Ou YC, Song JW, Zhang NS, Lee GC (2015) Cyclic loading test of unbonded and bonded posttensioned precast segmental bridge columns with circular section. J Bridg Eng 21:1–17


    Google Scholar
     

  • Cai Z-K, Wang Z, Yang TY (2018) Experimental testing and modeling of precast segmental bridge columns with hybrid normal- and high-strength steel rebars. Constr Build Mater 166:945–955

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Castel A, Coronelli D, Vu NA, François R (2011) Structural response of corroded, unbonded posttensioned beams. J Struct Eng 137:761–771

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cha KR, Seo J, Kim S, Kang YJ, Won D (2018) Cyclic response of a precast composite hollow reinforced concrete column using longitudinal rebars and base plate. Struct Concr 19:758–770

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chou CC, Chen YC (2006) Cyclic tests of post-tensioned precast CFT segmental bridge columns with unbonded strands. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:159–175

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dangol I, Pantelides CP (2022) Resilient posttensioned bridge bent with buckling restrained brace. J Bridg Eng 27(2):04021107

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davis PM, Janes TM, Haraldsson OS, Eberhard MO, Stanton JF (2017) Unbonded pretensioned columns for accelerated bridge construction in seismic regions. J Bridg Eng 22(5):04017003

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dimitrakopoulos EG, DeJong MJ (2012a) Overturning of retrofitted rocking structures under pulse-type excitations. J Eng Mech 138:963–972

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dimitrakopoulos EG, DeJong MJ (2012b) Revisiting the rocking block: closed-form solutions and similarity laws. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 468:2294–2318


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dimitrakopoulos EG, Giouvanidis AI (2015) Seismic response analysis of the planar rocking frame. J Eng Mech 141:04015003

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Do TV, Pham TM, Hao H (2018) Numerical investigation of the behavior of precast concrete segmental columns subjected to vehicle collision. Eng Struct 156:375–393

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Do TV, Pham TM, Hao H (2019a) Effects of steel confinement and shear keys on the impact responses of precast concrete segmental columns. J Constr Steel Res 158:331–349

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Do TV, Pham TM, Hao H (2019b) Impact response and capacity of precast concrete segmental versus monolithic bridge columns. J Bridg Eng 24(6):04019050

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dong H, Wen J, Han Q, Bi K, Zhou Y, Du X (2022) A novel self-centering braced double-column rocking bent for seismic resilience. J Earthq Eng:1–22

  • Du X-L, Zhou Y-L, Han Q, Jia Z-L (2019) Shaking table tests of a single-span freestanding rocking bridge for seismic resilience and isolation. Adv Struct Eng 22(15):3222–3233

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • ElGawady M, Booker AJ, Dawood H (2010) Seismic behavior of posttensioned concrete-filled fiber tubes. J Compos Constr 14:616–628

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • ElGawady M, Sha’lan A (2010) Seismic behavior of self-centering precast segmental bridge bents. J Bridg Eng 16:328–339

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guerrini G, Restrepo JI, Massari M, Vervelidis A (2015) Seismic behavior of posttensioned self-centering precast concrete dual-Shell steel columns. J Struct Eng 141:1–11

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guo T, Cao Z, Xu Z, Lu S (2015) Cyclic load tests on self-centering concrete pier with external dissipators and enhanced durability. J Struct Eng 142:1–15


    Google Scholar
     

  • Han Q, Jia Z, Xu K, Zhou Y, Du X (2019) Hysteretic behavior investigation of self-centering double-column rocking piers for seismic resilience. Eng Struct 188:218–232

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hao H, Li C, Bi K, Zuo H, Do VT (2020) Shake table studies of precast segmental columns made of geopolymer concrete with basalt FRP reinforcement. In: Australian earthquake engineering society virtual conference


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hao H, Zhang X, Li C, Do VT (2017) Impact response and mitigation of precast concrete segmental columns. In: 12th international conference on shock & impact loads on structures, Singapore

  • Hassanli R, Youssf O, Mills JE (2017) Seismic performance of precast posttensioned segmental FRP-confined and unconfined crumb rubber concrete columns. J Compos Constr 21(4):1–19

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hewes JT, Priestley MN (2002) Seismic design and performance of precast concrete segmental bridge columns. SSRP-2001/25. University of California, San Diego


    Google Scholar
     

  • Housner GW (1963) The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. B Seismol Soc Am 53:403–417

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ichikawa S, Matsuzaki H, Moustafa A, ElGawady MA, Kawashima K (2016) Seismic-resistant bridge columns with ultrahigh-performance concrete segments. J Bridg Eng 21(9):04016049

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jia J, Wei B, Bai Y, Wu S, Zhang K, Guo Y (2022) Seismic performance of precast segmental bridge columns reinforced with both stainless-steel bars and GFRP bars. J Bridg Eng 27(1):04021100

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jia J, Zhang K, Saiidi MS, Guo Y, Wu S, Bi K et al (2020a) Seismic evaluation of precast bridge columns with built-in elastomeric pads. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 128:105868

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jia J, Zhang K, Wu S, Guo Y, Du X, Wang X (2020b) Seismic performance of self-centering precast segmental bridge columns under different lateral loading directions. Eng Struct 221:111037

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jia Z, Wen J, Han Q, Du X, Zhang J (2021) Seismic response of a reduced-scale continuous girder bridge with rocking columns: experiment and analysis. Eng Struct 248:113265

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kagioglou P, Katakalos K, Mitoulis SA (2021) Resilient connection for accelerated bridge constructions. Structures 33:3025–3039

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kawashima K, MacRae GA, Hoshikuma J-i, Nagaya K (1998) Residual displacement response spectrum. J Struct Eng 124:523–530

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim DH, Kim MK, Zi G, Roh H (2015) Experimental test and seismic performance of partial precast concrete segmental bridge column with cast-in-place base. Eng Struct 100:178–188

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li C, Bi K, Hao H (2019b) Seismic performances of precast segmental column under bidirectional earthquake motions: shake table test and numerical evaluation. Eng Struct 187:314–328

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li C, Bi K, Hao H, Zhang X, Van Tin D (2019a) Cyclic test and numerical study of precast segmental concrete columns with BFRP and TEED. Bull Earthq Eng 17(6):3475–3494

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li C, Hao H, Bi K (2017b) Numerical study on the seismic performance of precast segmental concrete columns under cyclic loading. Eng Struct 148:373–386

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li C, Hao H, Zhang X, Bi K (2017a) Experimental study of precast segmental columns with unbonded tendons under cyclic loading. Adv Struct Eng 21:319–334

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li J, Hao H, Wu C (2017c) Numerical study of precast segmental column under blast loads. Eng Struct 134:125–137

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li Q, Bi K, Dong H, Li Y, Han Q, Du X (2022) Numerical studies on the seismic responses of precast segmental columns-supported bridge structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Adv Struct Eng 21:319–334

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li S, Zhao T, Alam MS, Cheng Z, Wang J-Q (2020) Probabilistic seismic vulnerability and loss assessment of a seismic resistance bridge system with post-tensioning precast segmental ultra-high performance concrete bridge columns. Eng Struct 225:111321

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu L, Ma ZJ, Zong Z, Tang G (2021) Blast response and damage mechanism of prefabricated segmental RC bridge Piers. J Bridg Eng 26(4):04021012

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu R, Palermo A (2020) Characterization of filler-free buckling restrained fuse-type energy dissipation device for seismic applications. J Struct Eng 146:04020059

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Makris N (2014a) A half-century of rocking isolation. Earthq Struct 7:1187–1221

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Makris N (2014b) The role of the rotational inertia on the seismic resistance of free-standing rocking columns and articulated frames. B Seismol Soc Am 104:2226–2239

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Makris N, Vassiliou MF (2012) Sizing the slenderness of free-standing rocking columns to withstand earthquake shaking. Arch Appl Mech 82:1497–1511

    MATH 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Makris N, Vassiliou MF (2013) Planar rocking response and stability analysis of an array of free-standing columns capped with a freely supported rigid beam. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42:431–449

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Makris N, Vassiliou MF (2015) Dynamics of the rocking frame with vertical restrainers. J Struct Eng 141:04014245

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Makris N, Zhang J (2001) Rocking response of anchored blocks under pulse-type motions. J Eng Mech 127:484–493

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mander JB, Cheng C-T (1997) Seismic resistance of bridge piers based on damage avoidance design. NCEER-97-0014


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mantawy IM, Sanders DH, Eberhard MO, Stanton JF (2019) Modelling of debonded reinforcement in ABC connections designed for seismic zones. Eng Struct 198:109351

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marriott D, Pampanin S, Palermo A (2009) Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38:331–354

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marriott D, Pampanin S, Palermo A (2011) Biaxial testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replacable dissipaters. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 40:1723–1741

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mashal M, Palermo A (2019) Low-damage seismic design for accelerated bridge construction. J Bridg Eng 24:04019066

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Milne J (1885) Seismic experiments. Trans Seismol Soc Jpn 8:1–82


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mitoulis SA, Rodriguez Rodriguez J (2017) Seismic performance of novel resilient hinges for columns and application on irregular bridges. J Bridg Eng 22(2):1–12

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Motaref S, Saiidi M, Sanders D (2010) Experimental study of precast bridge columns with built-in elastomer. Transp Res Rec 2202(1):109–116

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Motaref S, Saiidi MS, Sanders D (2013) Shake table studies of energy-dissipating segmental bridge columns. J Bridg Eng 19:186–199

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moustafa A, ElGawady MA (2018) Shaking table testing of segmental hollow-core FRP-concrete-steel bridge columns. J Bridg Eng 23:1–14

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moustafa A, ElGawady MA (2020) Performance of double skin FRP-concrete-steel self-centered segmental bridge piers subjected to forward-directivity near-fault ground motion. Eng Struct 221:111065

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nikbakht E, Rashid K (2018) Investigation on seismic performance and functionality of self-centring post-tensioned segmental columns. Struct Infrastruct Eng 14:730–742

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nikbakht E, Rashid K, Mohseni I, Hejazi F (2015) Evaluating seismic demands for segmental columns with low energy dissipation capacity. Earthq Struct 8:1277–1297

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nikoukalam MT, Sideris P (2021a) Experimental performance assessment of large-scale polyurethane-enhanced damage-resistant bridge columns with energy dissipation links. I: Overview and damage assessment. J Struct Eng 147(10):04021156

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nikoukalam MT, Sideris P (2021b) Experimental performance assessment of large-scale polyurethane-enhanced damage-resistant bridge columns with energy dissipation links. II: Quantitative results. J Struct Eng 147(10):04021156

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ou Y-C, Oktavianus Y, Tsai M-S (2013) An emulative precast segmental concrete bridge column for seismic regions. Earthq Spect 29:1441–1457

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ou YC, Tsai MS, Chang KC, Lee GC (2010) Cyclic behavior of precast segmental concrete bridge columns with high performance or conventional steel reinforcing bars as energy dissipation bars. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39:1181–1198

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ou YC, Wang PH, Tsai MS, Chang KC, Lee GC (2009) Large-scale experimental study of precast segmental unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns for seismic regions. J Struct Eng 136:255–264

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Palermo A, Pampanin S, Marriott D (2007) Design, modeling, and experimental response of seismic resistant bridge piers with posttensioned dissipating connections. J Struct Eng 133:1648–1661

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Piras S, Palermo A, Saiid Saiidi M (2022) State-of-the-art of posttensioned rocking bridge substructure systems. J Bridg Eng 27(3):03122001

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Podolny W Jr (1992) Corrosion of prestressing steels and its mitigation. PCI J 37:34–55

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Popa V, Papurcu A, Cotofana D, Pascu R (2015) Experimental testing on emulative connections for precast columns using grouted corrugated steel sleeves. Bull Earthq Eng 13:2429–2447

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ralls ML, Tang B, Bhidé S, Brecto B, Calvert E, Capers H et al (2005) Prefabricated bridge elements and systems in Japan and Europe. FHWA-PL-05-003. Federal Highway Administration, United States

  • Reggiani MN, Vassiliou MF, Mouzakis H, Badogiannis E (2021) Shaking table tests of a resilient bridge system with precast reinforced concrete columns equipped with springs. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 51(1):213–239

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reggiani Manzo N, Vassiliou MF (2021) Cyclic tests of a precast restrained rocking system for sustainable and resilient seismic design of bridges. Eng Struct 252:1–13


    Google Scholar
     

  • Salehi M, Sideris P, Liel AB (2017) Numerical simulation of hybrid sliding-rocking columns subjected to earthquake excitation. J Struct Eng 143:04017149

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Salehi M, Sideris P, Liel AB (2021b) Experimental testing of hybrid sliding-rocking bridge columns under torsional and biaxial lateral loading. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 50:2817–2837

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Salehi M, Valigura J, Sideris P, Liel AB (2021a) Experimental assessment of second-generation hybrid sliding-rocking bridge columns under reversed lateral loading for free and fixed end rotation conditions. J Bridg Eng 26(10):04021071

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shafieifar M, Farzad M, Azizinamini A (2018) New connection detail to connect precast column to cap beam using ultra-high-performance concrete in accelerated bridge construction applications. Transp Res Rec 2672(41):207–220

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shahawy M (2003) Prefabricated bridge elements and systems to limit traffic disruption during construction. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC


    Google Scholar
     

  • Shen Y, Liu X, Li Y, Li J (2021) Cyclic tests of precast post-tensioned concrete filled steel tubular (PCFT) columns with internal energy-dissipating bars. Eng Struct 229:111651

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shim CS, Chung CH, Kim HH (2008) Experimental evaluation of seismic performance of precast segmental bridge piers with a circular solid section. Eng Struct 30:3782–3792

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shim CS, Lee S, Park S, Koem C (2017) Experiments on prefabricated segmental bridge piers with continuous longitudinal reinforcing bars. Eng Struct 132:671–683

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sideris P, Aref AJ, Filiatrault A (2014a) Quasi-static cyclic testing of a large-scale hybrid sliding-rocking segmental column with slip-dominant joints. J Bridg Eng 19:04014036

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sideris P, Aref AJ, Filiatrault A (2014b) Large-scale seismic testing of a hybrid sliding-rocking posttensioned segmental bridge system. J Struct Eng 140:04014025

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sideris P, Aref AJ, Filiatrault A (2015) Experimental seismic performance of a hybrid sliding–rocking bridge for various specimen configurations and seismic loading conditions. J Bridg Eng 20:04015009

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sung Y-C, Hung H-H, Lin K-C, Jiang C-R, Chang K-C (2017) Experimental testing and numerical simulation of precast segmental bridge piers constructed with a modular methodology. J Bridg Eng 22:04017087

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tazarv M, Saiid Saiidi M (2015) Low-damage precast columns for accelerated bridge construction in high seismic zones. J Bridg Eng 21(3):1–13


    Google Scholar
     

  • Tazarv M, Saiidi MS (2015) UHPC-filled duct connections for accelerated bridge construction of RC columns in high seismic zones. Eng Struct 99:413–422

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thapa D, Pantelides CP (2021) Self-centering bridge bent with stretch length anchors as a tension-only hysteretic hybrid system. J Struct Eng 147(10):04021163

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thiers-Moggia R, Málaga-Chuquitaype C (2019) Seismic protection of rocking structures with inerters. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 48:528–547

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thiers-Moggia R, Málaga-Chuquitaype C (2020) Seismic control of flexible rocking structures using inerters. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 49:1519–1538

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thonstad T, Kennedy B, Schaefer J, Eberhard M, Stanton J (2017) Cyclic tests of precast pretensioned rocking bridge-column subassemblies. J Struct Eng 143:04017094

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tong T, Zhuo W, Jiang X, Lei H, Liu Z (2019) Research on seismic resilience of prestressed precast segmental bridge piers reinforced with high-strength bars through experimental testing and numerical modelling. Eng Struct 197:109335

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Valigura J, Salehi M, Liel AB, Sideris P (2020) Seismic repair assessment of hybrid sliding–rocking bridge columns through integrated experimentation and expert panel solicitation. J Struct Eng 146(9):04020191

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Varela S, Saiidi M (2016a) Resilient deconstructible columns for accelerated bridge construction in seismically active areas. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 28(13):1–24


    Google Scholar
     

  • Varela S, Saiidi M (2016b) A bridge column with superelastic NiTi SMA and replaceable rubber hinge for earthquake damage mitigation. Smart Mater Struct 25:1–18

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Varela S, Saiidi MS (2017) Experimental study on seismically resilient two-span bridge models designed for disassembly. J Earthq Eng 23(1):1–40


    Google Scholar
     

  • Vassiliou MF, Makris N (2015) Dynamics of the vertically restrained rocking column. J Eng Mech 141:04015049

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang J, Wang Z, Tang Y, Liu T, Zhang J (2018b) Cyclic loading test of self-centering precast segmental unbonded posttensioned UHPFRC bridge columns. Bull Earthq Eng 16:5227–5255

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang JC, Ou YC, Chang KC, Lee GC (2008) Large-scale seismic tests of tall concrete bridge columns with precast segmental construction. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:1449–1465

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang X, Shi J, Wu G, Yang L, Wu Z (2015) Effectiveness of basalt FRP tendons for strengthening of RC beams through the external prestressing technique. Eng Struct 101:34–44

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang Z, Ge J, Wei H (2014) Seismic performance of precast hollow bridge piers with different construction details. Front Struct Civ Eng 8:399–413

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang Z, Wang J, Tang Y, Liu T, Gao Y, Zhang J (2018a) Seismic behavior of precast segmental UHPC bridge columns with replaceable external cover plates and internal dissipaters. Eng Struct 177:540–555

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu M, Jin L, Du X (2021) Dynamic response analysis of bridge precast segment piers under vehicle collision. Eng Fail Anal 124:105363

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xue S, Hao H, Hao Y (2021) Numerical evaluation of the impact performance of precast concrete segmental columns and strengthening techniques. Eng Struct 244:112725

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yamashita R, Sanders DH (2009) Seismic performance of precast unbonded prestressed concrete columns. ACI Struct J 106:821–830


    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang C, Okumus P (2017) Ultrahigh-performance concrete for posttensioned precast bridge piers for seismic resilience. J Struct Eng 143:1–13

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zareie S, Issa AS, Seethaler RJ, Zabihollah A (2020) Recent advances in the applications of shape memory alloys in civil infrastructures: a review. Structures 27:1535–1550

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang D, Li N, Li Z-X (2021a) Seismic performance of precast segmental concrete-filled steel-tube bridge columns with internal and external energy dissipaters. J Bridg Eng 26(11):04021085

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang D, Li N, Li Z-X, Xie L (2020b) Seismic performance of bridge with unbonded posttensioned self-centering segmented concrete-filled steel-tube columns: an underwater shaking table test. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 138:106350

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang G, Han Q, Xu K, Du X, He W (2021b) Experimental investigation of seismic behavior of UHPC-filled socket precast bridge column-foundation connection with shear keys. Eng Struct 228:111527

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang J, Makris N (2001) Rocking response of free-standing blocks under cycloidal pulses. J Eng Mech 127:473–483

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang J, Wu J, Xie L, Li C, Zhu Y (2022) Precast concrete column base with replaceable energy dissipation connectors: quasi-static tests and numerical research. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 51(5):1038–1057

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang N (2014) Dynamic properties and application of steel fiber reinforced self-consolidating concrete to segmental bridge columns in moderate-to-high seismic regions. State University of New York, Buffalo


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang Q, Alam MS (2020) State-of-the-art review of seismic-resistant precast bridge columns. J Bridg Eng 25. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001620

  • Zhang X, Hao H (2019a) Improved impact resistant capacity of segmental column with fibre reinforced polymer wrap. Int J Impact Eng 125:117–133

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang X, Hao H (2019b) The response of precast concrete segmental columns subjected to near base impact. Int J Prot Struct 10:229–250

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang X, Hao H, Li C (2016a) Experimental investigation of the response of precast segmental columns subjected to impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 95:105–124

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang X, Hao H, Li C (2016b) The effect of concrete shear key on the performance of segmental columns subjected to impact loading. Adv Struct Eng 20:352–373

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang X, Hao H, Li C (2018a) Multi-hazard resistance capacity of precast segmental columns under impact and cyclic loading. Int J Prot Struct 9:24–43

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang X, Hao H, Li C, Do TV (2018b) Experimental study on the behavior of precast segmental column with domed shear key and unbonded post-tensioning tendon under impact loading. Eng Struct 173:589–605

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang Y, Fan W, Zhai Y, Yuan W (2019) Experimental and numerical investigations on seismic behavior of prefabricated bridge columns with UHPFRC bottom segments. J Bridg Eng 24:1–17


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang Y, Tabandeh A, Ma Y, Gardoni P (2020a) Seismic performance of precast segmental bridge columns repaired with CFRP wraps. Compos Struct 243:112218

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao L, Bi K, Hao H, Li X (2017) Numerical studies on the seismic responses of bridge structures with precast segmental columns. Eng Struct 151:568–583

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao L, Hao H, Bi K, Li X (2018) Numerical study of the seismic responses of precast segmental column bridge under spatially varying ground motions. J Bridg Eng 23(12):04018096

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhong C, Christopoulos C (2021) Self-centering seismic-resistant structures: historical overview and state-of-the-art. Earthq Spect 38(2):1321–1356

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhuo W, Liu Z, He Z, Zhang J (2019) Seismic evaluation of precast piers with different rebar strength based on characterized resilience parameters. J Test Eval 47(4):20170519

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    Disclaimer:

    This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.

    Click here for Source link (https://www.springeropen.com/)

    Loading