• Nobili A, Licata G, Salerno F, Pasina L, Tettamanti M, Franchi C, De Vittorio L, Marengoni A, Corrao S, Iorio A, Marcucci M, Mannucci PM (2011) Polypharmacy, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality among elderly patients in internal medicine wards. The REPOSI study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 67(5):507–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0977-0

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bailey SC, Oramasionwu CU, Wolf MS (2013) Rethinking adherence: a health literacy-informed model of medication self-management. J Health Commun 18(Suppl 1):20–30

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ballentine NH (2008) Polypharmacy in the elderly: maximizing benefit, minimizing harm. Crit Care Nurs Q 31(1):40–45

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abolhassani N, Castioni J, Marques-Vidal P, Vollenweider P, Waeber G (2017) Determinants of change in polypharmacy status in Switzerland: the population-based CoLaus study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 73(9):1187–1194

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Advinha AM, Lopes MJ, de Oliveira-Martins S (2017) Assessment of the elderly’s functional ability to manage their medication: a systematic literature review. Int J Clin Pharm 39(1):1–15

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mickelson RS, Unertl KM, Holden RJ (2016) Medication management: the macrocognitive workflow of older adults with heart failure. JMIR Hum Factors 3(2):e27

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pouliot A, Vaillancourt R, Stacey D, Suter P (2018) Defining and identifying concepts of medication literacy: an international perspective. Res Soc Admin Pharm 14(9):797–804

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gentizon J, Bovet E, Rapp E, Mabire C (2022) Medication literacy in hospitalized older adults: concept development. Health Lit Res Pract 6(2):e70–e83

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sheikh A, Rudan I, Cresswell K, Dhingra-Kumar N, Tan ML, Hakkinen ML et al (2019) Agreeing on global research priorities for medication safety: an international prioritisation exercise. J Glob Health 9(1):010422

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • World Health Organization. WHO Global patient safety challenge: Medication without harm Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 Available from: https://www.who.int/initiatives/medication-without-harm.

  • Capiau A, Foubert K, Van der Linden L, Walgraeve K, Hias J, Spinewine A et al (2020) Medication counselling in older patients prior to hospital discharge: a systematic review. Drug Aging 37(9):635–655

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alqenae FA, Steinke D, Keers RN (2020) Prevalence and nature of medication errors and medication-related harm following discharge from hospital to community settings: a systematic review. Drug Saf 43(6):517–537

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tomlinson J, Cheong VL, Fylan B, Silcock J, Smith H, Karban K et al (2020) Successful care transitions for older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of interventions that support medication continuity. Age Ageing 49(4):558–569

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Daliri S, Boujarfi S, El Mokaddam A, Scholte Op Reimer WJM, Ter Riet G, den Haan C et al (2021) Medication-related interventions delivered both in hospital and following discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Qual Saf 30(2):146–156

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reinhard SC, Levine C, Samis S (2014) Family caregivers providing complex chronic care to their spouses Washington DC: AARP Public Policy Institute. Available from: https://www.aarp.org/home-family/caregiving/info-04-2014/family-caregivers-providing-complex-chronic-care-to-spouses-AARP-ppi-health.html.

  • Look KA, Stone JA (2018) Medication management activities performed by informal caregivers of older adults. Res Social Adm Pharm 14(5):418–426

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pantuzza LLN, Nascimento E, Botelho SF, Martins MAP, Veloso RCSG, Nascimento MMG, Vieira LB, Reis AMM (2021) Mapping the construct and measurement of medication literacy: a scoping review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 87(3):754–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14490

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gentizon J, Hirt J, Jaques C, Lang PO, Mabire C (2021) Instruments assessing medication literacy in adult recipients of care: a systematic review of measurement properties. Int J Nurs Stud 113:103785

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Terwee CB, Prinsen C, Chiarotto A, de Vet H, Bouter LM, Alonso J, et al. (2018) COSMIN methodology for assessing the content validity of PROMs [User manual]. Amsterdam: Netherlands [72p.]. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-methodology-for-content-validity-user-manual-v1.pdf.

  • Carlton J, Peasgood T, Khan S, Barber R, Bostock J, Keetharuth AD (2020) An emerging framework for fully incorporating public involvement (PI) into patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). J Patient-Rep Outcom 4(1):4

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL (2011) Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge University Press

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Toepoel V, Vermeeren B, Metin B (2019) Smileys, stars, hearts, buttons, tiles or grids: influence of response format on substantive response, questionnaire experience and response time. Bms-Bullet Sociol Methodol-Bullet De Methodologie Sociologique 142(1):57–74

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Knauper B, Carriere K, Chamandy M, Xu Z, Schwarz N, Rosen NO (2016) How aging affects self-reports. Eur J Ageing 13(2):185–193

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • DeVellis RF (2016) Scale development: theory and applications, 4th edn. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, p 280


    Google Scholar
     

  • Polit DF, Yang F (2015) Measurement and the measurement of change: a primer for the health professions. Wolters Kluwer Health, Philadelphia, p 350


    Google Scholar
     

  • Tay L, Jebb A (2017) Scale development. In: Rogelberg S (eds). 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

  • Kimball S, Buck G, Goldstein D, Largaespada E, Logan L, Stebbins D et al (2010) Testing a teaching appointment and geragogy-based approach to medication knowledge at discharge. Rehabil Nurs 35(1):31–40

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD (2016) Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res 26(13):1753–1760

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Knafl K, Deatrick J, Gallo A, Holcombe G, Bakitas M, Dixon J et al (2007) The analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument development. Res Nurs Health 30(2):224–234

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hak T, Van der Veer K, Jansen H (2008) The three-step test-interview (TSTI): an observation-based method for pretesting self-completion questionnaires. Surv Res Methods 2(3)

  • Amini M, Oemrawsingh A, Verweij LM, Lingsma HF, Hazelzet JA, Eijkenaar F et al (2021) Facilitators and barriers for implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: an academic center’s initial experience. Health Policy 125(9):1247–1255

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Badawoud AM, Salgado TM, Lu J, Parsons P, Peron EP, Slattum PW (2020) Measuring medication self-management capacity: a scoping review of available instruments. Drug Aging 37(7):483–501

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nutbeam D (2000) Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int 15(3):259–267

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sykes S, Wills J, Rowlands G, Popple K (2013) Understanding critical health literacy: a concept analysis. BMC Pub Health 13:150

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dijkstra NE, Sino CG, Schuurmans MJ, Schoonhoven L, Heerdink ER (2020) Medication self-management: considerations and decisions by older people living at home. Res Soc Adm Pharm

  • Maidment ID, Lawson S, Wong G, Booth A, Watson A, McKeown J, Zaman H, Mullan J, Bailey S (2020) Medication management in older people: the MEMORABLE realist synthesis. Health Ser Deliv Res 8(26):1–128. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr08260

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kari H, Kortejärvi H, Airaksinen M, Laaksonen R (2018) Patient involvement is essential in identifying drug-related problems. Br J Clin Pharmacol 84(9):2048–2058

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Laroche ML, Van Ngo TH, Sirois C, Daveluy A, Guillaumin M, Valnet-Rabier MB et al (2021) Mapping of drug-related problems among older adults conciliating medical and pharmaceutical approaches. Eur Geriatr Med 12(3):485–497

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Susan Koch F, Gloth M, Nay R (eds) (2010) Medication management in older adults. Springer New York, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-457-9

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shreffler-Grant J, Weinert C, Nichols E (2014) Instrument to measure health literacy about complementary and alternative medicine. J Nurs Meas 22(3):489–499

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Knight DA, Thompson D, Mathie E, Dickinson A (2013) “Seamless care? Just a list would have helped!” Older people and their carer’s experiences of support with medication on discharge home from hospital. Health Expect 16(3):277–291

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Backman C, Cho-Young D (2019) Engaging patients and informal caregivers to improve safety and facilitate person- and family-centered care during transitions from hospital to home – a qualitative descriptive study. Patient Prefer Adher 13:617–626

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM et al (2018) COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 27(5):1171–1179

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E et al (2011) Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 2–assessing respondent understanding. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeco Outcomes Res 14(8):978–988

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Newman I, Lim J, Pineda F (2013) Content validity using a mixed methods approach: its application and development through the use of a table of specifications methodology. J Mixed Methods Res 7(3):243–260

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shiyanbola OO, Rao D, Bolt D, Brown C, Zhang M, Ward E (2021) Using an exploratory sequential mixed methods design to adapt an Illness Perception Questionnaire for African Americans with diabetes: the mixed data integration process. Health Psychol Behav Med 9(1):796–817

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cresswell J, Plano Clark V (2011) Designing and conducting mixed method research. 2nd Sage. Thousand Oaks, CA

  • Meijering J, Kampen J, Tobi H (2013) Quantifying the development of agreement among experts in Delphi studies. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 80(8):1607–1614

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar A-R (2015) Design and implementation content validity study: development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. J Caring Sci 4(2):165

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW et al (2018) COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 27(5):1147–1157

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nguyen TH, Han H-R, Kim MT, Chan KS (2014) An introduction to item response theory for patient-reported outcome measurement. Patient-Patient-Cent Outcomes Res 7(1):23–35

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quinonez HR, Young SL (2018) Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front Pub Health 6:149

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Petrillo J, Cano SJ, McLeod LD, Coon CD (2015) Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: a comparison of worked examples. Value Health 18(1):25–34

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kite J, Phongsavan P (2017) Insights for conducting real-time focus groups online using a web conferencing service. F1000Research 6:122. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10427.1

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Neter E, Brainin E (2012) eHealth literacy: extending the digital divide to the realm of health information. J Med Internet Res 14(1):e19

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Watkins I, Xie B (2014) eHealth literacy interventions for older adults: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res 16(11):e225

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Patton MQ (2014) Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice, 4th edn. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, CA


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jaul E, Barron J (2021) Characterizing the Heterogeneity of aging: a vision for a staging system for aging. Front Pub Health 9:513557

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Staats K, Grov EK, Husebo B, Tranvag O (2020) Framework for patient and informal caregiver participation in research (PAICPAIR): part 1. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 43(2):E58–E70

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    Disclaimer:

    This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.

    Click here for Source link (https://www.springeropen.com/)

    Loading