• Altman, D. G., & Royston, P. (2006). The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ, 332(7549), 1080.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bennetts, R. J., Johnson Humphrey, P., Zielinska, P., & Bate, S. (2022). Face masks versus sunglasses: Limited effects of time and individual differences in the ability to judge facial identity and social traits. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7(1), 1–24.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Benson, P. L., Karabenick, S. A., & Lerner, R. M. (1976). Pretty pleases: The effects of physical attractiveness, race, and sex on receiving help. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(5), 409–415.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bothwell, R. K., Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1989). Cross-racial identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(1), 19–25.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Capretto, T., Piho, C., Kumar, R., Westfall, J., Yarkoni, T., & Martin, O. A. (2022). Bambi: A simple interface for fitting Bayesian linear models in Python. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.10754.

  • de Fockert, J., & Wolfenstein, C. (2009). Rapid extraction of mean identity from sets of faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1716–1722.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Haan, M., Johnson, M. H., Maurer, D., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Recognition of individual faces and average face prototypes by 1- and 3-month-old infants. Cognitive Development, 16(2), 659–678.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Unger, L., Little, A. C., & Feinberg, D. R. (2007). Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: Attractive faces are not always average. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1420–1430.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dewhurst, S. A., Hay, D. C., & Wickham, L. H. (2005). Distinctiveness, typicality, and recollective experience in face recognition: A principal components analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 1032–1037.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dion, K. L., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Erian, M., Lin, C., Patel, N., Neal, A., & Geiselman, R. E. (1998). Juror verdicts as a function of victim and defendant attractiveness in sexual assault cases. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 16(3), 25–40.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guo, K., Hare, A., & Liu, C. H. (2022). Impact of face masks and viewers’ anxiety on ratings of first impressions from faces. Perception, 51(1), 37–50.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hancock, P. J., Burton, A. M., & Bruce, V. (1996). Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis. Memory & Cognition, 24(1), 26–40.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Herlitz, A., & Lovén, J. (2013). Sex differences and the own-gender bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic review. Visual Cognition, 21(9–10), 1306–1336.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hies, O., & Lewis, M. B. (2022). Beyond the beauty of occlusion: Medical masks increase facial attractiveness more than other face coverings. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7(1), 1–6.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Holzleitner, I. J., Lee, A. J., Hahn, A. C., Kandrik, M., Bovet, J., Renoult, J. P., Simmons, D., Garrod, O., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2019). Comparing theory-driven and data-driven attractiveness models using images of real women’s faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(12), 1589–1595.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Itz, M. L., Schweinberger, S. R., & Kaufmann, J. M. (2016). Effects of caricaturing in shape or color on familiarity decisions for familiar and unfamiliar faces. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149796.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jaquet, E., Rhodes, G., & Hayward, W. G. (2008). Race-contingent aftereffects suggest distinct perceptual norms for different race faces. Visual Cognition, 16(6), 734–753.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, A. L., & Jaeger, B. (2019). Biological bases of beauty revisited: The effect of symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism on female facial attractiveness. Symmetry, 11(2), 279.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, A. L., Kramer, R. S. S., & Ward, R. (2012). Signals of personality and health: The contributions of facial shape, skin texture, and viewing angle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1353–1361.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, A. L., Kramer, R. S. S., & Ward, R. (2014). Miscalibrations in judgements of attractiveness with cosmetics. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(10), 2060–2068.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kamatani, M., Ito, M., Miyazaki, Y., & Kawahara, J. I. (2021). Effects of masks worn to protect against COVID-19 on the perception of facial attractiveness. i-Perception, 12(3), 1–14.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kramer, R. S. S., Gous, G., Mireku, M. O., & Ward, R. (2022). Metacognition during unfamiliar face matching. British Journal of Psychology, 113(3), 696–717.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kramer, R. S. S., Ritchie, K. L., & Burton, A. M. (2015). Viewers extract the mean from images of the same person: A route to face learning. Journal of Vision, 15(4), 1–9.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kuefner, D., Macchi Cassia, V., Picozzi, M., & Bricolo, E. (2008). Do all kids look alike? Evidence for an other-age effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(4), 811–817.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1(2), 115–121.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19–40.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of effect existence and significance in the Bayesian framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2767.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McClelland, G. H., Lynch, J. G., Jr., Irwin, J. R., Spiller, S. A., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2015). Median splits, Type II errors, and false–positive consumer psychology: Don’t fight the power. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(4), 679–689.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McIntyre, A. H., Hancock, P. J., Kittler, J., & Langton, S. R. (2013). Improving discrimination and face matching with caricature. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(6), 725–734.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Miyazaki, Y., & Kawahara, J. I. (2016). The sanitary-mask effect on perceived facial attractiveness. Japanese Psychological Research, 58(3), 261–272.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morris, P. E., & Wickham, L. H. (2001). Typicality and face recognition: A critical re-evaluation of the two factor theory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(3), 863–877.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Neumann, M. F., Schweinberger, S. R., & Burton, A. M. (2013). Viewers extract mean and individual identity from sets of famous faces. Cognition, 128, 56–63.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nishimura, M., Doyle, J., Humphreys, K., & Behrmann, M. (2010). Probing the face-space of individuals with prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 48(6), 1828–1841.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Toole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A., Valentin, D., & Abdi, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory & Cognition, 22(2), 208–224.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oldmeadow, J. A., & Koch, C. (2021). Effects of face masks on person perception. Perception, 50(10), 876–889.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Olson, I. R., & Marshuetz, C. (2005). Facial attractiveness is appraised in a glance. Emotion, 5(4), 498.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(32), 11087–11092.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Or, C.C.-F., & Wilson, H. R. (2013). Implicit face prototype learning from geometric information. Vision Research, 82, 1–12.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Orghian, D., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2020). Humans judge faces in incomplete photographs as physically more attractive. Scientific Reports, 10, 110.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Patel, V., Mazzaferro, D. M., Sarwer, D. B., & Bartlett, S. P. (2020). Beauty and the mask. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open, 8(8), e3048.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pazhoohi, F., & Kingstone, A. (2022). Unattractive faces are more attractive when the bottom-half is masked, an effect that reverses when the top-half is concealed. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7(1), 1–10.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Pfeifer, C. (2012). Physical attractiveness, employment and earnings. Applied Economics Letters, 19(6), 505–510.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rab, S., Javaid, M., Haleem, A., & Vaishya, R. (2020). Face masks are new normal after COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 14(6), 1617–1619.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ritchie, K. L., Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. (2017). Forming impressions of facial attractiveness is mandatory. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ryali, C. K., Goffin, S., Winkielman, P., & Angela, J. Y. (2020). From likely to likable: The role of statistical typicality in human social assessment of faces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(47), 29371–29380.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Salvatier, J., Wiecki, T. V., & Fonnesbeck, C. (2016). Probabilistic programming in Python using PyMC3. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e55.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100(2), 139–156.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smithson, M., & Verkuilen, J. (2006). A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychological Methods, 11(1), 54–71.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tiddeman, B., Burt, M., & Perrett, D. (2001). Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21, 42–50.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 43(2), 161–204.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    Disclaimer:

    This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.

    Click here for Source link (https://www.springeropen.com/)