Elad D, Jaffa AJ, Grisaru D (2020) Biomechanics of early life in the female reproductive tract. Physiology 35:134–143
Matsuzaki S (2021) Mechanobiology of the female reproductive system. Reprod Med Biol 20:371–401
Sternberg AK, Buck VU, Classen-Linke I, Leube RE (2021) How mechanical forces change the human endometrium during the menstrual cycle in preparation for embryo implantation. Cells 10:66
Peñuela LA, Fulcheri E, Vellone VG et al (2019) Atomic force microscopy: a promising aid in diagnosis of uterine smooth muscle neoplasms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 221:362–364
Fang S, McLean J, Shi L et al (2021) Anisotropic mechanical properties of the human uterus measured by spherical indentation. Ann Biomed Eng 49:1923–1942
Buggio L, Dridi D, Barbara G (2021) Adenomyosis: impact on fertility and obstetric outcomes. Reprod Sci 28:3081–3084
Kirschen GW, AlAshqar A, Miyashita-Ishiwata M et al (2021) Vascular biology of uterine fibroids: connecting fibroids and vascular disorders. Reproduction 162:R1–R18
Kurek A, Kłosowicz E, Sofińska K, Jach R, Barbasz J (2021) Methods for studying endometrial pathology and the potential of atomic force microscopy in the research of endometrium. Cells 10:66
Sichitiu J, Meuwly JY, Baud D, Desseauve D (2021) Using shear wave elastography to assess uterine tonicity after vaginal delivery. Sci Rep 11:10420
Manduca A, Bayly PJ, Ehman RL et al (2021) MR elastography: principles, guidelines, and terminology. Magn Resonan Med 85:2377–2390
Colon-Caraballo M, Lee N, Nallasamy S et al (2022) Novel regulatory roles of small leucine-rich proteoglycans in remodeling of the uterine cervix in pregnancy. Matrix Biol 105:53–71
Patberg ET, Wells M, Vahanian SA et al (2021) Use of cervical elastography at 18 to 22 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 225:525.e521–525.e529
Diniz-da-Costa M, Kong CS, Fishwick KJ et al (2021) Characterization of highly proliferative decidual precursor cells during the window of implantation in human endometrium. Stem Cells 39:1067–1080
Enciso M, Aizpurua J, Rodríguez-Estrada B et al (2021) The precise determination of the window of implantation significantly improves ART outcomes. Sci Rep 11:13420
Cenkeri HC, Bidaci TB, Yilmaz B, Desteli G (2020) Role of acoustic radiation force-based elasticity imaging in endometrium pathologies. Niger J Clin Pract 23:1339–1344
Prašnikar E, Kunej T, Gorenjak M et al (2022) Transcriptomics of receptive endometrium in women with sonographic features of adenomyosis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 20:2
Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK (2017) Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics 7:1303–1329
Wang L (2018) Acoustic radiation force based ultrasound elasticity imaging for biomedical applications. Sensors 18:66
Nazzaro G, Saccone G, Miranda M et al (2022) Cervical elastography using E-cervix for prediction of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies with threatened preterm labor. J Matern Fet Neonat Med 35:330–335
Yang JY, Qiu BS (2021) The advance of magnetic resonance elastography in tumor diagnosis. Front Oncol 11:722703
di Pasquo E, Kiener AJO, DallAsta A et al (2020) Evaluation of the uterine scar stiffness in women with previous Cesarean section by ultrasound elastography: a cohort study. Clin Imaging 64:53–56
Feltovich H, Carlson L (2017) New techniques in evaluation of the cervix. Semin Perinatol 41:477–484
Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML et al (2015) WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol 41:1126–1147
Zhang HP, Gu JY, Bai M et al (2020) Value of shear wave elastography with maximal elasticity in differentiating benign and malignant solid focal liver lesions. World J Gastroenterol 26:7416–7424
Dietrich CF, Bibby E, Jenssen C et al (2018) EUS elastography: How to do it? Endosc Ultrasound 7:20–28
Dokumaci DS, Uyanikoglu H (2022) Shear-wave elastography for detection of placenta percreta: a case-controlled study. Acta Radiol 63:424–430
Oskovi Kaplan ZA, Ozgu-Erdinc AS (2018) Prediction of preterm birth: maternal characteristics, ultrasound markers, and biomarkers: an updated overview. J Pregnan 2018:8367571
Jondal DE, Wang J, Chen J et al (2018) Uterine fibroids: correlations between MRI appearance and stiffness via magnetic resonance elastography. Abdom Radiol 43:1456–1463
Bildaci TB, Cevik H, Yilmaz B, Desteli GA (2018) Value of in vitro acoustic radiation force impulse application on uterine adenomyosis. J Med Ultrason 45:425–430
Stoelinga B, Hehenkamp WJK, Nieuwenhuis LL et al (2018) Accuracy and reproducibility of sonoelastography for the assessment of fibroids and adenomyosis, with magnetic resonance imaging as reference standard. Ultrasound Med Biol 44:1654–1663
Frank ML, Schäfer SD, Möllers M et al (2016) Importance of transvaginal elastography in the diagnosis of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. Ultrashall Med 37:373–378
Liu X, Ding D, Ren Y, Guo SW (2018) Transvaginal elastosonography as an imaging technique for diagnosing adenomyosis. Reprod Sci 25:498–514
Pongpunprut S, Panburana P, Wibulpolprasert P et al (2022) A comparison of shear wave elastography between normal myometrium uterine fibroids, and adenomyosis: a cross-sectional study. Int J Fertil Steril 16:49–54
Görgülü FF, Okçu NT (2021) Which imaging method is better for the differentiation of adenomyosis and uterine fibroids? J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 50:102002
Xie M, Yu H, Zhang X, Wang W, Ren Y (2019) Elasticity of adenomyosis is increased after GnRHa therapy and is associated with spontaneous pregnancy in infertile patents. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 48:849–853
Samanci C, Önal Y (2020) Shearwave elastographic evaluation of uterine leiomyomas after uterine artery embolization: preliminary results. Turk J Med Sci 50:426–432
Munro MG (2021) Adenomyosis: a riddle, wrapped in mystery, inside an enigma. Fertil Steril 116:89–90
Xie T, Xu X, Yang Y et al (2021) The role of abnormal uterine junction zone in the occurrence and development of adenomyosis. Reprod Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00684-2
Harmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw RA et al (2021) Consensus on revised definitions of morphological uterus sonographic assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of a modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 6:66
Chapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P et al (2020) Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Hum Reprod Update 26:392–411
Gultekin IB, Imamoglu GI, Turgal M et al (2016) Elastosonographic evaluation of patients with a sonographic finding of thickened endometrium. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 198:105–109
Czuczwar P, Wozniak S, Szkodziak P et al (2016) Elastography improves the diagnostic accuracy of sonography in differentiating endometrial polyps and submucosal fibroids. J Ultrasound Med 35:2389–2395
Du YY, Yan XJ, Guo YJ et al (2021) Transvaginal real-time shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of endometrial lesions. Int J Gen Med 14:2849–2856
Ma H, Yang Z, Wang Y et al (2021) The value of shear wave elastography in predicting the risk of endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia. J Ultrasound Med 40:2441–2448
Vora Z, Manchanda S, Sharma R et al (2022) Transvaginal shear wave elastography for assessment of endometrial and subendometrial pathologies: a prospective pilot study. J Ultrasound Med 41:61–70
Zhao HX, Du YY, Guo YJ et al (2021) Application value of real-time shear wave elastography in diagnosing the depth of infiltrating muscular layer of endometrial cancer. J Ultrasound Med 40:1851–1861
O’Hara S, Zelesco M, Sun Z (2021) Shear wave elastography of the maternal cervix: a comparison of transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound approaches. J Ultrasound Med 40:701–712
Fu B, Zhang H, Song ZW et al (2020) Value of shear wave elastography in the diagnosis and evaluation of cervical cancer. Oncol Lett 20:2232–2238
Zhang Y, Yan Y, Yang Y (2019) Study on value of ultrasonic elastography in diagnosis of clinical staging of cervical cancer and efficacy evaluation of radiotherapy. Oncol Lett 17:4901–4906
Shao J, Shi G, Qi Z, Zheng J, Chen S (2021) Advancements in the application of ultrasound elastography in the cervix. Ultrasound Med Biol 47:2048–2063
Castro L, García-Mejido JA, Arroyo E et al (2020) Influence of epidemiological characteristics (age, parity and other factors) in the assessment of healthy uterine cervical stiffness evaluated through shear wave elastography as a prior step to its use in uterine cervical pathology. Arch Gynecol Obstet 302:753–762
Braun LA, Kostas-Polston EA, Miedema J, Hoffecker L, Wilson C (2021) A scoping review of cervical cancer risk factors, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in U.S. active duty military women. Womens Health Issues 31(Suppl 1):S53-s65
Dudea-Simon M, Dudea SM, Ciortea R, Malutan A, Mihu D (2021) Elastography of the uterine cervix in gynecology: normal appearance, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer. A systematic review. Med Ultrasonogr 23:74–82
Dudea-Simon M, Dudea SM, Burde A et al (2020) Usefulness of real time elastography strain ratio in the assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer using a reference material. Med Ultrasonogr 22:145–151
Sun L, Shan X, Dong Q et al (2021) Ultrasonic elastography combined with human papilloma virus detection based on intelligent denoising algorithm in diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Comput Math Methods Med 2021:8066133
Yoshimasa Y, Maruyama T (2021) Bioengineering of the uterus. Reprod Sci 28:1596–1611
Soliman AA, Wojcinski S, Degenhardt F (2015) Ultrasonographic examination of the endometrium and myometrium using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging technology: an initial experience with a new method. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 59:235–243
Manchanda S, Vora Z, Sharma R et al (2019) Quantitative sonoelastographic assessment of the normal uterus using shear wave elastography: an initial experience. J Ultrasound Med 38:3183–3189
Jiang X, Asbach P, Streitberger KJ et al (2014) In vivo high-resolution magnetic resonance elastography of the uterine corpus and cervix. Eur Radiol 24:3025–3033
Samir C, Kurtek S, Srivastava A, Canis M (2014) Elastic shape analysis of cylindrical surfaces for 3D/2D registration in endometrial tissue characterization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 33:1035–1043
Swierkowski-Blanchard N, Boitrelle F, Alter L et al (2017) Uterine contractility and elastography as prognostic factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 107:961-968.e963
Kabukçu C, Çabuş Ü, Öztekin Ö, Fenkçi V (2021) The strain rate of endometrium measured by real-time sonoelastography as a predictive marker for pregnancy in gonadotropin stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 47:3561–3570
Shui X, Yu C, Li J, Jiao Y (2021) Development and validation of a pregnancy prediction model based on ultrasonographic features related to endometrial receptivity. Am J Transl Res 13:6156–6165
Jung YJ, Kwon H, Shin J et al (2021) The feasibility of cervical elastography in predicting preterm delivery in singleton pregnancy with short cervix following progesterone treatment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:66
Carlson LC, Hall TJ, Rosado-Mendez IM, Palmeri ML, Feltovich H (2018) Detection of changes in cervical softness using shear wave speed in early versus late pregnancy: an in vivo cross-sectional study. Ultrasound Med Biol 44:515–521
Chen CY, Chen CP, Sun FJ (2020) Assessment of the cervix in pregnant women with a history of cervical insufficiency during the first trimester using elastography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 99:1497–1503
Du L, Lin MF, Wu LH et al (2020) Quantitative elastography of cervical stiffness during the three trimesters of pregnancy with a semiautomatic measurement program: a longitudinal prospective pilot study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 46:237–248
Du L, Zhang LH, Zheng Q et al (2020) Evaluation of cervical elastography for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in low-risk women: a prospective study. J Ultrasound Med 39:705–713
Duan H, Chaemsaithong P, Ju X et al (2020) Shear-wave sonoelastographic assessment of cervix in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 99:1458–1468
Gultekin S, Gultekin IB, Icer B et al (2017) Comparison of elastosonography and digital examination of cervix for consistency to predict successful vaginal delivery after induction of labor with oxytocin. J Matern Fet Neonatal Med 30:2795–2799
Hernandez-Andrade E, Maymon E, Luewan S et al (2018) A soft cervix, categorized by shear-wave elastography, in women with short or with normal cervical length at 18–24 weeks is associated with a higher prevalence of spontaneous preterm delivery. J Perinatal Med 46:489–501
Mlodawski J, Mlodawska M, Plusajska J et al (2021) Repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative cervical strain elastography (E-Cervix) in pregnancy. Sci Rep 11:236–89
Park HS, Kwon H, Kwak DW et al (2019) Addition of cervical elastography may increase preterm delivery prediction performance in pregnant women with short cervix: a prospective study. J Korean Med Sci 34:e68
Peralta L, Molina FS, Melchor J et al (2017) Transient elastography to assess the cervical ripening during pregnancy: a preliminary study. Ultrashall Med 38:395–402
Yo Y, Kotani Y, Shiro R et al (2020) Relationship between cervical elastography and spontaneous onset of labor. Sci Rep 10:19685
Wang B, Zhang Y, Chen S et al (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting preterm delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 98:e16449
Strobel MK, Eveslage M, Köster HA et al (2021) Cervical elastography strain ratio and strain pattern for the prediction of a successful induction of labour. J Perinat Med 49:195–202
Kwak DW, Kim M, Oh SY et al (2020) Reliability of strain elastography using in vivo compression in the assessment of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Perinat Med 48:256–265
Lu J, Cheng YKY, Ho SYS et al (2020) The predictive value of cervical shear wave elastography in the outcome of labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 99:59–68
Thomsen CR, Jensen MSS, Leonhard AK et al (2022) A force-measuring device combined with ultrasound-based elastography for assessment of the uterine cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 101:241–247
Hamza A, Radosa J, Gerlinger C et al (2021) Cervical and lower uterine parameter ultrasound and elastographic parameters for the prediction of a successful induction of labor. Ultrashall Med 42:520–528
Albayrak E, Dogru HY, Ozmen Z et al (2016) Is evaluation of placenta with real-time sonoelastography during the second trimester of pregnancy an effective method for the assessment of spontaneous preterm birth risk? Clin Imaging 40:926–930
Tolunay HE, Eroğlu H, Çelik ÖY et al (2021) Can placental elasticity predict the time of delivery in cases of threatened preterm labor? J Obstet Gynaecol Res 47:606–612
Della Rosa PA, Miglioli C, Caglioni M et al (2021) A hierarchical procedure to select intrauterine and extrauterine factors for methodological validation of preterm birth risk estimation. BMC Pregnan Childb 21:306
Mwita S, Jande M, Katabalo D, Kamala B, Dewey D (2021) Reducing neonatal mortality and respiratory distress syndrome associated with preterm birth: a scoping review on the impact of antenatal corticosteroids in low- and middle-income countries. World J Pediatr 17:131–140
Mottet N, Cochet C, Vidal C et al (2020) Feasibility of two-dimensional ultrasound shear wave elastography of human fetal lungs and liver: a pilot study. Diagn Interven Imaging 101:69–78
Mottet N, Aubry S, Vidal C et al (2017) Feasibility of 2-D ultrasound shear wave elastography of fetal lungs in case of threatened preterm labour: a study protocol. BMJ Open 7:e018130
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Disclaimer:
This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.
Click here for Source link (https://www.springeropen.com/)
