• Albareda-Tiana, S., Vidal-Raméntol, S., Pujol-Valls, M., & Fernández-Morilla, M. (2018). Holistic approaches to develop sustainability and research competencies in pre-service teacher training. Sustainability, 10(10), 3698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103698

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Algoe, S. B., Kurtz, L. E., & Hilaire, N. M. (2016). Putting the “you” in “thank you”: Examining other-praising behavior as the active relational ingredient in expressed gratitude. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 658–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616651681

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Allen, S. (2018). The science of gratitude. John Templeton Foundation.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Amati, V., Lomi, A., & Mira, A. (2018). Social network modeling. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 5(1), 343–369. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100746

    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Avry, S., Chanel, G., Bétrancourt, M., & Molinari, G. (2020). Achievement appraisals, emotions and socio-cognitive processes: How they interplay in collaborative problem-solving? Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106267,106267

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barton, A. W., Futris, T. G., & Nielsen, R. B. (2015). Linking financial distress to marital quality: The intermediary roles of demand/withdraw and spousal gratitude expressions. Personal Relationships, 22(3), 536–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12094

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bono, G., Froh, J. J., Disabato, D., Blalock, D., McKnight, P., & Bausert, S. (2019). Gratitude’s role in adolescent antisocial and prosocial behavior: A 4-year longitudinal investigation. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(2), 230–243.

  • Butz, N. T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2017). Improving student relatedness through an online discussion intervention: The application of self-determination theory in synchronous hybrid programs. Computers & Education, 114, 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.006

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, H. H., & Chuang, S.-S. (2011). Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator. Information and Management, 48(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.11.001

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, Y. P., Lin, Y. C., & Chen, L. H. (2012). Pay it forward: Gratitude in social networks. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(5), 761–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9289-z

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Collange, J., & Guegan, J. (2020). Using virtual reality to induce gratitude through virtual social interaction. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106473

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Flores-Salgado, E., & Castineira-Benitez, T. A. (2018). The use of politeness in WhatsApp discourse and move “requests.” Journal of Pragmatics, 133, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.009

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Gratitude, like other positive emotions, broadens and builds. In R. A. Emmons & M. E. McCullough (Eds.), The psychology of gratitude (pp. 145–166). Oxford University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Freitas, L. B. D. L., Pieta, M. A. M., & Tudge, J. R. H. (2011). Beyond politeness: The expression of gratitude in children and adolescents. Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica, 24(4), 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722011000400016

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Froh, J. J., Emmons, R. A., Card, N. A., Bono, G., & Wilson, J. A. (2011). Gratitude and the reduced costs of materialism in adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9195-9

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Froh, J. J., Sefick, W. J., & Emmons, R. A. (2008). Counting blessings in early adolescents: An experimental study of gratitude and subjective well-being. Journal of School Psychology, 46(2), 213–233.

  • Fujiyama, H. (2020). Recent trends in social network analysis. Dokkyo Keizai, 106, 93–110.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Grant, A., & Dutton, J. (2012). Beneficiary or benefactor: Are people more prosocial when they reflect on receiving or giving? Psychological Science, 23(9), 1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612439424

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Greetham, D. V., Hurling, R., Osborne, G., & Linley, A. (2011). Social networks and positive and negative affect. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 22, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.051

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gul, R., Ellahi, N., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2021). The complementarities of big data and intellectual capital on sustainable value creation; collective intelligence approach. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04338-z

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Handcock, M. S. (2003). Statistical models for social networks: Degeneracy and inference. In R. Breiger, K. Carley, & P. Pattison (Eds.), Dynamic social network modeling and analysis (pp. 229–240). National Academies Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Howells, K. (2004). The role of gratitude in higher education. Research and Development in Higher Education, 27(2), 164–173.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Howells, K. (2012). Gratitude in education: A radical view. Sense Publishers.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Howells, K. (2014). An exploration of the role of gratitude in enhancing teacher–student relationships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 42, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.04.004

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • King, R. B., & Datu, J. A. D. (2018). Grateful students are motivated, engaged, and successful in school: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and experimental evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 70, 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.08.001

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kornienko, O., Clemans, K. H., Out, D., & Granger, D. A. (2014). Hormones, behavior, and social network analysis: Exploring associations between cortisol, testosterone, and network structure. Hormones and Behavior, 66(3), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.07.009

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kumar, A. (2022). Some things are not better left unsaid: Interpersonal barriers to gratitude expression and prosocial engagement. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.011

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lambert, N. M., Clark, M. S., Durtschi, J., Fincham, F. D., & Graham, S. M. (2010). Benefits of expressing gratitude: Expressing gratitude to a partner changes one’s view of the relationship. Psychological Science, 21(4), 574–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610364003

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Layous, K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2014). Benefits, mechanisms, and new directions for teaching gratitude to children. School Psychology Review, 43(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2014.12087441

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Locher, M. A. (2010). Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research Language Behaviour Culture, 6(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.001

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Luckie, D. B., Bellon, R., & Sweeder, R. D. (2012). The BRAID: Experiments in stitching together disciplines at a Big Ten university. Journal of STEM Education Innovations and Research, 13(2), 6–14.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Luke, D. A. (2015). A user’s guide to network analysis in R. Springer.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., & Robins, G. (2013). Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications. Cambridge University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mamas, C., Bjorklund, P., Daly, A. J., & Moukarzel, S. (2020). Friendship and support networks among students with disabilities in middle school. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101608,101608

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. A. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.112

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McNulty, J. K., & Dugas, A. (2019). A dyadic perspective on gratitude sheds light on both its benefits and its costs: Evidence that low gratitude acts as a “weak link.” Journal of Family Psychology, 33(7), 876–881. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000533

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Misiejuk, K., Wasson, B., & Egelandsdal, K. (2021). Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106658

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Murphy, M., & Sashi, C. M. (2018). Communication, interactivity, and satisfaction in B2B relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 68, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.020

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oliver, M. B., Hartmann, T., & Woolley, J. K. (2012). Elevation in response to entertainment portrayals of moral virtue. Human Communication Research, 38(3), 360–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01427.x

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Riquelme, F., Munoz, R., Mac Lean, R., Villarroel, R., Barcelos, T. S., & de Albuquerque, V. H. C. (2019). Using multimodal learning analytics to study collaboration on discussion groups. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18(3), 633–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00683-w

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schwade, F., & Schubert, P. (2018). Social collaboration analytics for enterprise social software: A literature review. Practice, 2, 3.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Silk, M. J., & Fisher, D. N. (2017). Understanding animal social structure: Exponential random graph models in animal behaviour research. Animal Behaviour, 132, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.08.005

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Snijders, T. A. (2002). Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of exponential random graph models. Journal of Social Structure, 3(2), 1–40.

    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Solis, B. (2011). The end of business as usual: Rewire the way you work to succeed in the consumer revolution. John Wiley & Sons.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Spillane, J. P., Kim, C. M., & Frank, K. A. (2012). Instructional advice and information providing and receiving behavior in elementary schools: Exploring tie formation as a building block in social capital development. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1112–1145. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212459339

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (2003). Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3–4), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2003.9682897

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tejedor, G., Segalàs, J., Barrón, Á., Fernández-Morilla, M., Fuertes, M. T., & Ruiz-Morales, J. (2019). Didactic strategies to promote competencies in sustainability. Sustainability, 11(7), 2086. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072086

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tough, P. (2011, September 18). What if the secret to success is failure. New York Times Magazine, Retrieved September 14 from https://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/18/magazine/what-if-the-secret-to-success-is-failure.html

  • UNESCO Division for Inclusion, Peace, and sustainable development, education sector. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.


    Google Scholar
     

  • United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Retrieved December 10, 2020 from https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2020). Percentage of students in lower secondary showing adequate understanding of issues relating to global citizenship and sustainability. Retrieved December 10, 2020 from http://uis.unesco.org/en/glossary-term/percentage-students-lower-secondary-showing-adequate-understanding-issues-relating?wbdisable=true

  • Valdez, J. P. M., & Chu, S. K. W. (2020). Examining the psychometric validity of the five-item gratitude questionnaire: An item response theory approach. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 38(4), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918816542

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Valdez, J. P. M., Datu, J. A. D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Gratitude intervention optimizes effective learning outcomes in Filipino high school students: A mixed-methods study. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104268

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Valociková, C., & Velencei, J. (2020). How did reciprocity evolve in online communication? Turnout of reciprocal altruism. Theory Methodology Practice, 16(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.18096/TMP.2020.02.11

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van der Pol, J. (2019). Introduction to network modeling using exponential random graph models (ERGM): Theory and an application using R-project. Computational Economics, 54(3), 845–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-018-9853-2

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vercellone-Smith, P., Jablokow, K., & Friedel, C. (2012). Characterizing communication networks in a web-based classroom: Cognitive styles and linguistic behavior of self-organizing groups in online discussions. Computers & Education, 59(2), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.006

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Walker, J., Kumar, A., & Gilovich, T. (2016). Cultivating gratitude and giving through experiential consumption. Emotion, 16(8), 1126–1136. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000242

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Watkins, P. C., Woodward, K., Stone, T., & Kolts, R. L. (2003). Gratitude and happiness: Development of a measure of gratitude, and relationships with subjective well-being. Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal, 31(5), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.5.431

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Yu, J. H., Alamri, H., & Mueller, C. (2017). Learner profiles of attitudinal learning in a MOOC: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Computers and Education, 114, 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.005

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • White, P. (1999). Gratitude, citizenship and education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 18(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005183220317

    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilson, J. T. (2016). Brightening the mind: The impact of practicing gratitude on focus and resilience in learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i4.19998

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilson, J., & Foster, R. (2018). The power, structure, and practice of gratitude in education: A demonstration of epistemology and empirical research working together. International Christian Community of Teacher Educators Journal, 13(1), 4.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilson, J., & Harris, P. (2015). Ripples of gratitude: The flow-on effects of practicing gratitude in the classroom environment. International Christian Community of Teacher Educators Journal, 10(1), 1–12.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wood, A. M., Froh, J. J., & Geraghty, A. W. (2010). Gratitude and well-being: A review and theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 890–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yon, G. G. V., Slaughter, A., & De La Haye, K. (2021). Exponential random graph models for little networks. Social Networks, 64, 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2020.07.005

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yoshida, M. (2021). Investigation of university students’ behaviour in a Heterarchical Twitter community. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3155–3174.

  • Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    Disclaimer:

    This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.

    Click here for Source link (https://www.springeropen.com/)

    Loading