Collection of material

The inclusion criteria were histologically verified T1N0 and T1N1b tumors according to the AJCC/UICC pTNM classification, 8th Edition, 2017 [1, 42]. Twenty-five small PTCs without metastasis (pT1N0) and 19 (pT1N1b) with metastasis were selected from the Swedish National Quality Register for Thyroid Cancer. Tissues from primary tumors and lymph node metastases were then collected from three local biobanks as paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissue samples. One of the patients in the metastatic group was excluded since the tissue samples were not available, and another patient in this group was excluded because the tissue sample was of poor quality. After these exclusions, the resulting final cohort consisted of 44 patients. Complementary information was collected from the patients’ medical and pathology records, such as tumor size, tumor side, nodal status, age at diagnosis, and method of surgery.

Immunohistochemistry staining

Five-micrometer thick, paraffin-embedded tissue slices were cut and stained using four different antibodies: anti-Col1 antibody (rabbit polyclonal ab34710, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-Col4 antibody (mouse monoclonal antibody, BM4067, OriGene, Maryland, USA), anti-aSMA antibody (rabbit polyclonal ab5694, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and anti-MMP9 antibody (rabbit polyclonal ab38898, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The antibodies were diluted with PBS as follows: anti-collagen I 1:800, anti-collagen IV 1:50, anti-aSMA 1:200, and anti-MMP9 1:200.

Antigen retrieval was performed using CC1 antigen retrieval buffer (EDTA based) for collagen I, CC2 (citrate-based) antigen retrieval buffer for a-SMA and MMP9 and protease 2 enzyme-based pre-treatment for collagen IV. All the retrievals and immunohistochemistry staining were done using the Ventana Benchmark LT system (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA).

Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis

The samples were analyzed using light microscopy and sample pictures for each score were used to make the assessments more objective. To avoid subjectivity, two of the authors (HB & GB) performed the analysis and scoring of the individual sample separately. The results were then compared, and the mean value was calculated. The agreement of evaluation was measured by Cohen’s Kappa interrater reliability test, resulting in a mean coefficient of 0.86, indicating very good agreement.

For patients with multiple tumors (multifocal tumors), the largest one was chosen for analysis. Most of the patients in the pT1N1b group had several metastatic lymph nodes, and in these cases, we chose to stain and analyze several of these, when possible. The non-metastatic lymph nodes from the T1N0 group were not analyzed. Some cases contained both metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes: in these cases, the non-metastatic ones were used for comparison. When more than one metastatic lymph node was found on the same glass, the analysis was performed in such a way that each glass obtained a collected score, meaning that the expression in each lymph node contributed to the assessment and an average of these resulted in a score for the sample.

When looking at the PTC tissue samples, we evaluated trademarks for cancer such as papillary architecture, disorganization, large and clear nucleoli, mitoses, and the so-called “Orphan Annie-eyes,” that is, large round cells with a dense nucleus and clear cytoplasm, compared to the normal tissue.

The staining was evaluated based on location, intensity, and distribution.

The location of the different stains had to be analyzed regarding staining in unexpected patterns, since it is expected with some expression of Col1, Col4, a-SMA, and MMP-9 in both types of samples, even if normal tissue. The scoring was based on how much the staining’s expression in the metastatic areas differed from the non-metastatic parts of the lymph node (normal part) and was performed in the same way for tumorous vs non-tumorous areas in the thyroid samples. Details of the location scoring system are found in Table 1 and Fig. 1.

Table 1 Scoring system for Col1, Col4, a-SMA, and MMP-9—location score
Fig. 1
figure 1

Immunohistochemical examples of various biomarkers and scores. A shows Col1 in PTC with slight expression and intensity in the tumor stroma. Normal location. B shows Col1 in PTC with strong expression and intensity in the tumor stroma. Normal location. C shows Col4 in a lymph node with no expression in the metastatic tumorous tissue. Normal expression and location in the normal lymphatic tissue nearby. D shows Col4 in PTC with strong distribution and intensity in the basement membrane and tumor stroma. Abnormal expression and location of the collagen type IV fibers. E shows a-SMA in PTC with slight distribution and intensity. Normal location. F shows a-SMA in PTC with medium distribution and intensity. Abnormal location. G shows MMP-9 in PTC with slight distribution and intensity. Normal location. H shows MMP-9 in PTC with strong distribution and intensity. Abnormal location. Pictures were taken using the Panoramic P250 FIII slide scanner (3DHISTECH) and reproduced using CaseViewer (3DHISTECH) at a 50-μm scale

The intensity of the positive-stained areas in the tumorous areas or metastatic lymph nodes was scored as follows: 0, none; 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, strong.

The distribution of the staining was assessed with scores from 0 to 4, purely based on how much percentage of the tumor’s stroma, or metastatic area of the sample, had a positive stain, as shown in Table 2. A score of 0 means that there was a completely negative stain, i.e., a negative control. A score from 1 to 4 was then given when there was a positive stain surrounding the cancerous or follicular cells, with a focus on the fibers surrounding/between rows of cells. In the case of MMP-9, we even looked at the distribution of the tumor epithelial cells. When analyzing the lymph nodes, the capsule (in the case of Col1) and the vessels (in the case of Col4 and a-SMA) were disregarded, since these are expected to have a positive stain in all samples. We also applied the distribution score for the healthy parts of our specimens in order to compare it with the pathological one. Details of the distribution scoring system are found in Table 2 and Fig. 1.

Table 2 Scoring system for Col1, Col4, a-SMA, and MMP-9—distribution score (percentage) in the tissue

When scoring samples with multiple lymph nodes in the same sample, the metastatic parts of each were assessed to a combined score for the sample. In some of the thyroid samples, thyroiditis and/or goiter were present, and in these cases, the healthiest areas were used for comparison with the tumor.

Both the intensity and the distribution scores were added together to create a total score (0–7 points).

Cutoff levels for the percentage of cells with a positive stain within the metastatic/cancerous stroma/between healthy follicular cells.

Statistical methods

SPSS (Version 25.0, SPPS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. Fischer’s exact test was used for gender comparison. Mann–Whitney U test was used for the mean comparison between the N0T and N1T/N1N groups. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for median comparison between the metastatic tumors (N1T) and their corresponding lymph nodes (N1N). The Spearman’s rho nonparametric test was used to check for correlations between the metastatic tumors (N1T) and their corresponding lymph nodes (N1N). We calculated the Cohen coefficient κ for the statistical analysis of interobserver reliability. A value of 1 means total agreement, and a value of 0 means that the agreement does not exceed the random measure. The graphs were created using GraphPad Prism (Version 9, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.


This article is autogenerated using RSS feeds and has not been created or edited by OA JF.

Click here for Source link (